Walker v. The Queen
Court headnote
Walker v. The Queen Court (s) Database Tax Court of Canada Judgments Date 2006-12-06 Neutral citation 2006 TCC 673 File numbers 2004-3495(IT)G Judges and Taxing Officers David W. Beaubier Subjects Income Tax Act Decision Content Citation: 2006TCC673 Date: 20061206 Docket: 2004-3495(IT)G BETWEEN: JAMES WALKER, Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. ____________________________________________________________________ Motion heard on December 5, 2006 at Vancouver, British Columbia By: The Honourable Justice D.W. Beaubier Appearances: Counsel for the Appellant: Thomas M. Boddez Counsel for the Respondent: Lynn M. Burch ____________________________________________________________________ REASONS FOR ORDER ANDORDER Beaubier, J. [1] This motion by the Respondent dated November 19, 2004 was heard at Vancouver, British Columbia on December 5, 2006. It is a Motion to dismiss the Notice of Appeal because the Appellant has not filed a timely objection to the Notice of Reassessment. [2] The Affidavit of Kasandra Sproson, the Respondent's manager in T 1 services at the pertinent times, dated 19 November 2004, and the Examination on this Affidavit of March 30, 2006 were reviewed extensively. [3] These indicate that: 1. No one from the Respondent's staff has been able to testify that the actual alleged Notice of Reassessment was placed in an envelope and mailed to the Appellant on May 13, 2002 as stated by the Respondent. It was not received by the Appellant. 2. That registered ma…
Read full judgment
Walker v. The Queen Court (s) Database Tax Court of Canada Judgments Date 2006-12-06 Neutral citation 2006 TCC 673 File numbers 2004-3495(IT)G Judges and Taxing Officers David W. Beaubier Subjects Income Tax Act Decision Content Citation: 2006TCC673 Date: 20061206 Docket: 2004-3495(IT)G BETWEEN: JAMES WALKER, Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. ____________________________________________________________________ Motion heard on December 5, 2006 at Vancouver, British Columbia By: The Honourable Justice D.W. Beaubier Appearances: Counsel for the Appellant: Thomas M. Boddez Counsel for the Respondent: Lynn M. Burch ____________________________________________________________________ REASONS FOR ORDER ANDORDER Beaubier, J. [1] This motion by the Respondent dated November 19, 2004 was heard at Vancouver, British Columbia on December 5, 2006. It is a Motion to dismiss the Notice of Appeal because the Appellant has not filed a timely objection to the Notice of Reassessment. [2] The Affidavit of Kasandra Sproson, the Respondent's manager in T 1 services at the pertinent times, dated 19 November 2004, and the Examination on this Affidavit of March 30, 2006 were reviewed extensively. [3] These indicate that: 1. No one from the Respondent's staff has been able to testify that the actual alleged Notice of Reassessment was placed in an envelope and mailed to the Appellant on May 13, 2002 as stated by the Respondent. It was not received by the Appellant. 2. That registered mail envelope and the alleged contents were destroyed on their return to the Respondent before the end of May, 2002. 3. That alleged original Notice of Reassessment is not in evidence. [4] An actual Notice of Reassessment dated May 13, 2002 was sent to the Appellant's counsel on October 30, 2003 and a Notice of Objection to that was filed by the Respondent on a timely basis. [5] As a result, the Notice of Appeal filed in this matter is a valid Notice of Appeal. [6] The Motion is dismissed. Costs are in the cause. Signed at Vancouver, British Columbia, this 6th day of December, 2006. "D.W. Beaubier" Beaubier J. CITATION: 2006TCC673 COURT FILE NO.: 2004-3495(IT)G STYLE OF CAUSE: James Walker v. The Queen PLACE OF HEARING: Vancouver, British Columbia DATE OF HEARING: December 5, 2006 REASONS FOR ORDER BY: The Honourable Justice D.W. Beaubier DATE OF ORDER: December 6, 2006 APPEARANCES: Counsel for the Appellant: Thomas M. Boddez Counsel for the Respondent: Lynn M. Burch COUNSEL OF RECORD: For the Appellant: Name: Thomas M. Boddez Firm: Thorsteinssons LLP For the Respondent: John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Canada
Source: decision.tcc-cci.gc.ca