Skip to main content
Tax Court of Canada· 2006

Walker v. The Queen

2006 TCC 673
EvidenceJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Walker v. The Queen Court (s) Database Tax Court of Canada Judgments Date 2006-12-06 Neutral citation 2006 TCC 673 File numbers 2004-3495(IT)G Judges and Taxing Officers David W. Beaubier Subjects Income Tax Act Decision Content Citation: 2006TCC673 Date: 20061206 Docket: 2004-3495(IT)G BETWEEN: JAMES WALKER, Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. ____________________________________________________________________ Motion heard on December 5, 2006 at Vancouver, British Columbia By: The Honourable Justice D.W. Beaubier Appearances: Counsel for the Appellant: Thomas M. Boddez Counsel for the Respondent: Lynn M. Burch ____________________________________________________________________ REASONS FOR ORDER ANDORDER Beaubier, J. [1] This motion by the Respondent dated November 19, 2004 was heard at Vancouver, British Columbia on December 5, 2006. It is a Motion to dismiss the Notice of Appeal because the Appellant has not filed a timely objection to the Notice of Reassessment. [2] The Affidavit of Kasandra Sproson, the Respondent's manager in T 1 services at the pertinent times, dated 19 November 2004, and the Examination on this Affidavit of March 30, 2006 were reviewed extensively. [3] These indicate that: 1. No one from the Respondent's staff has been able to testify that the actual alleged Notice of Reassessment was placed in an envelope and mailed to the Appellant on May 13, 2002 as stated by the Respondent. It was not received by the Appellant. 2. That registered ma…

Read full judgment
Walker v. The Queen
Court (s) Database
Tax Court of Canada Judgments
Date
2006-12-06
Neutral citation
2006 TCC 673
File numbers
2004-3495(IT)G
Judges and Taxing Officers
David W. Beaubier
Subjects
Income Tax Act
Decision Content
Citation: 2006TCC673
Date: 20061206
Docket: 2004-3495(IT)G
BETWEEN:
JAMES WALKER,
Appellant,
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
Respondent.
____________________________________________________________________
Motion heard on December 5, 2006 at Vancouver, British Columbia
By: The Honourable Justice D.W. Beaubier
Appearances:
Counsel for the Appellant:
Thomas M. Boddez
Counsel for the Respondent:
Lynn M. Burch
____________________________________________________________________
REASONS FOR ORDER ANDORDER
Beaubier, J.
[1] This motion by the Respondent dated November 19, 2004 was heard at Vancouver, British Columbia on December 5, 2006. It is a Motion to dismiss the Notice of Appeal because the Appellant has not filed a timely objection to the Notice of Reassessment.
[2] The Affidavit of Kasandra Sproson, the Respondent's manager in T 1 services at the pertinent times, dated 19 November 2004, and the Examination on this Affidavit of March 30, 2006 were reviewed extensively.
[3] These indicate that:
1. No one from the Respondent's staff has been able to testify that the actual alleged Notice of Reassessment was placed in an envelope and mailed to the Appellant on May 13, 2002 as stated by the Respondent. It was not received by the Appellant.
2. That registered mail envelope and the alleged contents were destroyed on their return to the Respondent before the end of May, 2002.
3. That alleged original Notice of Reassessment is not in evidence.
[4] An actual Notice of Reassessment dated May 13, 2002 was sent to the Appellant's counsel on October 30, 2003 and a Notice of Objection to that was filed by the Respondent on a timely basis.
[5] As a result, the Notice of Appeal filed in this matter is a valid Notice of Appeal.
[6] The Motion is dismissed. Costs are in the cause.
Signed at Vancouver, British Columbia, this 6th day of December, 2006.
"D.W. Beaubier"
Beaubier J.
CITATION: 2006TCC673
COURT FILE NO.: 2004-3495(IT)G
STYLE OF CAUSE: James Walker v. The Queen
PLACE OF HEARING: Vancouver, British Columbia
DATE OF HEARING: December 5, 2006
REASONS FOR ORDER BY: The Honourable Justice D.W. Beaubier
DATE OF ORDER: December 6, 2006
APPEARANCES:
Counsel for the Appellant:
Thomas M. Boddez
Counsel for the Respondent:
Lynn M. Burch
COUNSEL OF RECORD:
For the Appellant:
Name: Thomas M. Boddez
Firm: Thorsteinssons LLP
For the Respondent: John H. Sims, Q.C.
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Ottawa, Canada

Source: decision.tcc-cci.gc.ca

Related cases