Bhatia v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
Source text
Bhatia v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2006-12-22 Neutral citation 2006 FC 1550 File numbers IMM-6577-06 Decision Content Date: 20061222 Docket: IMM-6577-06 Citation: 2006 FC 1550 Ottawa, Ontario, this 22nd day of December 2006 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Pinard BETWEEN: YASH PAL BHATIA Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent UPON MOTION on behalf of the applicant for an Order to stay the execution of his Removal Order scheduled to occur on December 28, 2006; UPON hearing this motion together with a similar motion in Court File IMM-6578-06; UPON reading the material before the Court; AND UPON hearing counsel for the parties by telephone conference; REASONS FOR ORDER and ORDER The requested stay is denied on the basis of lack of a serious issue. The applicant is essentially challenging the PRRA officer’s findings of fact and weighing of the evidence. In that regard, the applicant has failed to satisfy me that he has an arguable case concerning the PRRA officer’s finding that his Pre-Removal Risk Assessment was based on the same risks that were presented to the Refugee Protection Division which had denied his refugee claim and the additional finding that he had provided insufficient new evidence to warrant a different conclusion. Furthermore, the applicant has not pointed to any evidence of new risks that was before the PRRA officer, who must be presumed to have considered a…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Bhatia v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2006-12-22 Neutral citation 2006 FC 1550 File numbers IMM-6577-06 Decision Content Date: 20061222 Docket: IMM-6577-06 Citation: 2006 FC 1550 Ottawa, Ontario, this 22nd day of December 2006 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Pinard BETWEEN: YASH PAL BHATIA Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent UPON MOTION on behalf of the applicant for an Order to stay the execution of his Removal Order scheduled to occur on December 28, 2006; UPON hearing this motion together with a similar motion in Court File IMM-6578-06; UPON reading the material before the Court; AND UPON hearing counsel for the parties by telephone conference; REASONS FOR ORDER and ORDER The requested stay is denied on the basis of lack of a serious issue. The applicant is essentially challenging the PRRA officer’s findings of fact and weighing of the evidence. In that regard, the applicant has failed to satisfy me that he has an arguable case concerning the PRRA officer’s finding that his Pre-Removal Risk Assessment was based on the same risks that were presented to the Refugee Protection Division which had denied his refugee claim and the additional finding that he had provided insufficient new evidence to warrant a different conclusion. Furthermore, the applicant has not pointed to any evidence of new risks that was before the PRRA officer, who must be presumed to have considered all of the evidence before her, which directly contradicted any of her conclusions. Finally, I agree with the respondent that it was entirely reasonable for the PRRA officer to find that the applicant did not address the Refugee Protection Division’s findings with respect to State protection and internal flight alternative. ORDER Consequently, the motion is dismissed. “Yvon Pinard” Judge FEDERAL COURT NAME OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-6577-06 STYLE OF CAUSE: YASH PAL BHATIA v. THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION HEARING HELD BY TELEPHONE CONFERENCE DATE OF HEARING: December 21, 2006 REASONS FOR ORDER and ORDER: Pinard J. DATED: December 22, 2006 APPEARANCES: Mr. Boniface Ahunwan FOR THE APPLICANT Mr. John Provart FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Boniface Ahunwan FOR THE APPLICANT North York, Ontario John H. Sims, Q.C. FOR THE RESPONDENT Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca
Démocratie en surveillance c. Canada (Procureur général)
2024 CAF 75