Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada Inc. v. Apotex Inc.
Court headnote
Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada Inc. v. Apotex Inc. Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2004-01-27 Neutral citation 2004 FCA 43 File numbers A-188-03 Decision Content Date: 20040127 Docket: A-188-03 Citation: 2004 FCA 43 CORAM: STRAYER J.A. SEXTON J.A. EVANS J.A. BETWEEN: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CANADA INC. Appellant (Defendant) and APOTEX INC. Respondent (Plaintiff) and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN and BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY Respondents (Defendants) Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on January 27, 2004. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on January 27, 2004. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: STRAYER J.A. Date: 20040127 Docket: A-188-03 Citation: 2004 FCA 43 CORAM: STRAYER J.A. SEXTON J.A. EVANS J.A. BETWEEN: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CANADA INC. Appellant (Defendant) and APOTEX INC. Respondent (Plaintiff) and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN and BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY Respondents (Defendants) REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on January 27, 2004) STRAYER J.A. [1] We are of the view that on the basis of the arguments before him it was open to the learned Motions Judge to conclude that there was a genuine issue for trial which would require a more complete argument and possibly evidence. Even if, as the appellant urges, this involved a genuine issue which is a question of law, the Motions Judge had a discretion under Rule 216(2)(b) as to whether he would grant summary judgment. We see nothing unreasonable in t…
Read full judgment
Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada Inc. v. Apotex Inc. Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2004-01-27 Neutral citation 2004 FCA 43 File numbers A-188-03 Decision Content Date: 20040127 Docket: A-188-03 Citation: 2004 FCA 43 CORAM: STRAYER J.A. SEXTON J.A. EVANS J.A. BETWEEN: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CANADA INC. Appellant (Defendant) and APOTEX INC. Respondent (Plaintiff) and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN and BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY Respondents (Defendants) Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on January 27, 2004. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on January 27, 2004. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: STRAYER J.A. Date: 20040127 Docket: A-188-03 Citation: 2004 FCA 43 CORAM: STRAYER J.A. SEXTON J.A. EVANS J.A. BETWEEN: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CANADA INC. Appellant (Defendant) and APOTEX INC. Respondent (Plaintiff) and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN and BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY Respondents (Defendants) REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on January 27, 2004) STRAYER J.A. [1] We are of the view that on the basis of the arguments before him it was open to the learned Motions Judge to conclude that there was a genuine issue for trial which would require a more complete argument and possibly evidence. Even if, as the appellant urges, this involved a genuine issue which is a question of law, the Motions Judge had a discretion under Rule 216(2)(b) as to whether he would grant summary judgment. We see nothing unreasonable in the manner in which that discretion was exercised. [2] The appeal will therefore be dismissed with party-party costs fixed at $10,000 inclusive of G.S.T. and disbursements. "B. L. Strayer" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET : A-188-03 STYLE OF CAUSE : BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CANADA INC. Appellant (Defendant) and APOTEX INC. Respondent (Plaintiff) and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN and BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY Respondents (Defendants) PLACE OF HEARING : TORONTO, ONTARIO DATE OF HEARING : JANUARY 27, 2004 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT : (STRAYER, SEXTON, EVANS JJ.A.) DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: STRAYER J.A. APPEARANCES : Mr. Alexander G. Macklin, Q.C. Ms. Cristin Wagner FOR THE APPELLANT Mr. Andrew Brodkin Ms. Julie Perrin FOR THE RESPONDENT, APOTEX INC. SOLICITORS OF RECORD : Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP Ottawa, Ontario FOR THE APPELLANT Goodmans LLP Toronto, Ontario FOR THE RESPONDENT, APOTEX INC.
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca