Jagmohan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

Jagmohan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
Court (s) Database
Federal Court Decisions
Date
2007-08-30
Neutral citation
2007 FC 873
File numbers
IMM-5167-06
Decision Content
Date: 20070830
Docket: IMM-5167-06
Citation: 2007 FC 873
Ottawa, Ontario, August 30th, 2007
PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice O'Reilly
BETWEEN:
KRIS JAGMOHAN
Applicant
and
THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP
AND IMMIGRATION
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT
[1] Mr. Kris Jagmohan came to Canada from Trinidad and Tobago as a farm worker during the autumn months of 2003, 2004 and 2005. He did not return home after his last stint, instead, he remained in Canada and made a claim for refugee protection.
[2] A panel of the Immigration and Refugee Board heard and dismissed his claim in 2006. Mr. Jagmohan argues that the Board failed to appreciate the essence of his claim and asks me to order a new hearing. I can find no basis for overturning the Board’s decision and must, therefore, dismiss this application for judicial review.
I. Issue
[3] Did the Board fail to consider the essence of Mr. Jagmohan’s claim?
II. Analysis
[4] Mr. Jagmohan alleged that he was the victim of a robbery and that he was singled out by the perpetrators because of his race. His ancestry is Indian. He claims that Indians are persecuted by blacks in Trinidad and Tobago, and that the police force, being predominantly black, does not protect the Indian population.
[5] The Board found that the documentary evidence showed that crime was a genuine problem in Trinidad and Tobago. However, the evidence did not support Mr. Jagmohan’s assertion that Indians are singled out or that the police do not protect them. Accordingly, the Board concluded that Mr. Jagmohan had not been persecuted because of his race or membership in a particular social group, nor was he likely to be exposed to a risk of cruel and unusual treatment, torture or death.
[6] I have reviewed the entire record carefully and can find no basis for overturning the Board’s decision. Therefore, I must dismiss this application for judicial review. No question of general importance will be certified.
JUDGMENT
THIS COURT’S JUDGMENT IS THAT:
1. The application for judicial review is dismissed;
2. No question of general importance is stated.
“James W. O’Reilly”
Judge
FEDERAL COURT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: IMM-5167-06
STYLE OF CAUSE: KRIS JAGMOHAN v. MCI
PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO
DATE OF HEARING: August 15, 2007
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
AND JUDGMENT: O’REILLY J.
DATED: August 30th, 2007
APPEARANCES:
MR. KRIS JAGMOHAN
FOR THE APPLICANT (SELF-REPRESENTED)
MS. DUPE OLUYOMI
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
MR. KRIS JAGMOHAN
Toronto, Ontario
FOR THE APPLICANT
(SELF REPRESENTED)
JOHN H. SIMS, Q.C.
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Toronto, Ontario
FOR THE RESPONDENT