Canadian Gas Powder and Launches v. Orr Bros.
Court headnote
Canadian Gas Powder and Launches v. Orr Bros. Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1911-12-22 Report (1911) 46 SCR 636 Judges Fitzpatrick, Charles; Davies, Louis Henry; Idington, John; Duff, Lyman Poore; Anglin, Francis Alexander; Brodeur, Louis-Philippe On appeal from Ontario Subjects Sale Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Canadian Gas Power and Launches v. Orr Bros., (1911) 46 S.C.R. 636 Date: 1911-12-22 Canadian Gas Power and Launches and Orr Brothers 1911: November 20; 1911: December 22. Present: Sir Charles Fitzpatrick C.J. and Davies, Idington, Duff, Anglin and Brodeur JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO. Sale of goods—Express or implied warranty—Evidence. APPEAL from a decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario[1], affirming the judgment at the trial in favour of the respondents (defendants). The plaintiffs brought action for the balance of the price of an engine and dynamo sold to the defendants, who pleaded that they were sold under an express, or, if not, an implied, warranty that they would “run properly” and be fit for the special purpose for which they were intended and alleged a breach of such warranty. The plaintiffs contended that all necessary conditions were fulfilled to entitle them to payment and that defendants knowing the capabilities of the articles sold deliberately accepted them, taking the risk of failure. The trial judge held that there was a warranty as alleged and that the plaintiff had not fulfilled their part of the con…
Read full judgment
Canadian Gas Powder and Launches v. Orr Bros. Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1911-12-22 Report (1911) 46 SCR 636 Judges Fitzpatrick, Charles; Davies, Louis Henry; Idington, John; Duff, Lyman Poore; Anglin, Francis Alexander; Brodeur, Louis-Philippe On appeal from Ontario Subjects Sale Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Canadian Gas Power and Launches v. Orr Bros., (1911) 46 S.C.R. 636 Date: 1911-12-22 Canadian Gas Power and Launches and Orr Brothers 1911: November 20; 1911: December 22. Present: Sir Charles Fitzpatrick C.J. and Davies, Idington, Duff, Anglin and Brodeur JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO. Sale of goods—Express or implied warranty—Evidence. APPEAL from a decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario[1], affirming the judgment at the trial in favour of the respondents (defendants). The plaintiffs brought action for the balance of the price of an engine and dynamo sold to the defendants, who pleaded that they were sold under an express, or, if not, an implied, warranty that they would “run properly” and be fit for the special purpose for which they were intended and alleged a breach of such warranty. The plaintiffs contended that all necessary conditions were fulfilled to entitle them to payment and that defendants knowing the capabilities of the articles sold deliberately accepted them, taking the risk of failure. The trial judge held that there was a warranty as alleged and that the plaintiff had not fulfilled their part of the contract. He, therefore, dismissed their action and gave judgment for the defendants on a counterclaim demanding a return of the money paid on account with interest. This judgment was affirmed by the Court of Appeal. The plaintiffs appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada which, after hearing counsel for the respective parties, reserved judgment and, on a subsequent day, dismissed the appeal with costs. Appeal dismissed with costs. G.H. Watson K.C. for the appellants. E.F.B. Johnston K.C. for the respondents. [1] 23 Ont. L.R. 616.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca