Ogawa v. Fujiwara
Court headnote
Ogawa v. Fujiwara Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1937-02-17 Report [1938] SCR 170 Judges Duff, Lyman Poore; Rinfret, Thibaudeau; Crocket, Oswald Smith; Kerwin, Patrick; Hudson, Albert Blellock On appeal from British Columbia Subjects Motor vehicles Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Ogawa v. Fujiwara, [1938] S.C.R. 170 Date: 1937-02-17 Ogawa v. Fujiwara 1937: February 17 Present: Duff C.J. and Rinfret, Crocket, Kerwin and Hudson JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA Motor vehicles—Acts in emergencies—Negligent cutting in by defendant—Plaintiff's use of accelerator instead of brake. APPEAL by the defendant from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia[1], affirming the judgment of the trial judge, Manson J.[2], and maintain- ing the plaintiffs' action for damages arising out of an automobile accident, the defendant being found negligent in cutting in sharply in front of the plaintiff's car immediately after passing it. On the appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, after hearing the argument of counsel for the appellant, the Court, without calling in counsel for the respondent, delivered judgment orally dismissing the appeal with costs, the Chief Justice, for the Court, stating that there was no reason to disagree with the finding of the trial judge. Appeal dismissed with costs. Alfred Bull K.C. for the appellant. C. H. Locke K.C. for the respondent. [1] [1937] 3 W.W.R. 670. [2] [1937] 1 W.W.R. 364. …
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.scc-csc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Ogawa v. Fujiwara Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1937-02-17 Report [1938] SCR 170 Judges Duff, Lyman Poore; Rinfret, Thibaudeau; Crocket, Oswald Smith; Kerwin, Patrick; Hudson, Albert Blellock On appeal from British Columbia Subjects Motor vehicles Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Ogawa v. Fujiwara, [1938] S.C.R. 170 Date: 1937-02-17 Ogawa v. Fujiwara 1937: February 17 Present: Duff C.J. and Rinfret, Crocket, Kerwin and Hudson JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA Motor vehicles—Acts in emergencies—Negligent cutting in by defendant—Plaintiff's use of accelerator instead of brake. APPEAL by the defendant from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia[1], affirming the judgment of the trial judge, Manson J.[2], and maintain- ing the plaintiffs' action for damages arising out of an automobile accident, the defendant being found negligent in cutting in sharply in front of the plaintiff's car immediately after passing it. On the appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, after hearing the argument of counsel for the appellant, the Court, without calling in counsel for the respondent, delivered judgment orally dismissing the appeal with costs, the Chief Justice, for the Court, stating that there was no reason to disagree with the finding of the trial judge. Appeal dismissed with costs. Alfred Bull K.C. for the appellant. C. H. Locke K.C. for the respondent. [1] [1937] 3 W.W.R. 670. [2] [1937] 1 W.W.R. 364.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca
Childs v Desormeaux
[2006] 1 SCR 643