Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2004

China Ceramic Proppant Ltd. v. Carbo Ceramics Inc.

2004 FCA 274
EvidenceJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

China Ceramic Proppant Ltd. v. Carbo Ceramics Inc. Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2004-08-06 Neutral citation 2004 FCA 274 File numbers A-401-04 Decision Content Date: 20040806 Docket: A-401-04 Citation: 2004 FCA 274 Present: ROTHSTEIN J.A. BETWEEN: CHINA CERAMIC PROPPANT LTD. Appellant (Moving Party) and CARBO CERAMICS INC. Respondent Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on August 6, 2004. Order delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on August 6, 2004. REASONS FOR ORDER BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A. Date: 20040806 Docket: A-401-04 Citation: 2004 FCA 274 Present: ROTHSTEIN J.A. BETWEEN: CHINA CERAMIC PROPPANT LTD. Appellant (Moving Party) and CARBO CERAMICS INC. Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER (Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on August 6, 2004) ROTHSTEIN J.A. [1] This is an application for a stay, pending appeal, of an injunction granted by the Federal Court. The appeal is scheduled to be heard on September 1, less than one month from now. While I appreciate the concerns expressed by counsel for the appellant, the evidence does not demonstrate that the appellant will be put out of business permanently if the injunction remains in place until the appeal is heard and determined. I am, therefore, not satisfied that the appellant has satisfied the irreparable harm test for a stay. The motion for stay must be dismissed. The respondent shall have costs of $2,500 inclusive of fees and disbursements. "Marshall Rothstein" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUN…

Read full judgment
China Ceramic Proppant Ltd. v. Carbo Ceramics Inc.
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2004-08-06
Neutral citation
2004 FCA 274
File numbers
A-401-04
Decision Content
Date: 20040806
Docket: A-401-04
Citation: 2004 FCA 274
Present: ROTHSTEIN J.A.
BETWEEN:
CHINA CERAMIC PROPPANT LTD.
Appellant (Moving Party)
and
CARBO CERAMICS INC.
Respondent
Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on August 6, 2004.
Order delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on August 6, 2004.
REASONS FOR ORDER BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A.
Date: 20040806
Docket: A-401-04
Citation: 2004 FCA 274
Present: ROTHSTEIN J.A.
BETWEEN:
CHINA CERAMIC PROPPANT LTD.
Appellant (Moving Party)
and
CARBO CERAMICS INC.
Respondent
REASONS FOR ORDER
(Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on August 6, 2004)
ROTHSTEIN J.A.
[1] This is an application for a stay, pending appeal, of an injunction granted by the Federal Court. The appeal is scheduled to be heard on September 1, less than one month from now. While I appreciate the concerns expressed by counsel for the appellant, the evidence does not demonstrate that the appellant will be put out of business permanently if the injunction remains in place until the appeal is heard and determined. I am, therefore, not satisfied that the appellant has satisfied the irreparable harm test for a stay. The motion for stay must be dismissed. The respondent shall have costs of $2,500 inclusive of fees and disbursements.
"Marshall Rothstein"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-401-04
Motion for a stay of the Order of the Honourable Mr. Justice Shore dated July 28, 2004 in file T-909-04
STYLE OF CAUSE: CHINA CERAMIC PROPPANT LTD.
v.
CARBO CERAMICS INC.
PLACE OF HEARING: OTTAWA
DATE OF HEARING: August 6, 2004
REASONS FOR ORDER
DELIVERED FROM THE
BENCH BY: Mr. Justice Rothstein
APPEARANCES:
Mr. Trevor McDonald
FOR THE APPELLANT
Mr. Christopher Van Barr
Mr. Anthony Creber
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Nelligan, O'Brien, Payne
Ottawa, Ontario
FOR THE APPELLANT
Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
Ottawa, Ontario
FOR THE RESPONDENT

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases