Skip to main content
Supreme Court of Canada· 1920

McNichol v. Burns

(1920) 60 SCR 648
TortJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

McNichol v. Burns Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1920-03-08 Report (1920) 60 SCR 648 Judges Davies, Louis Henry; Idington, John; Duff, Lyman Poore; Anglin, Francis Alexander; Brodeur, Louis-Philippe; Mignault, Pierre-Basile On appeal from Alberta Subjects Torts Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada McNichol v. Burns, (1920) 60 S.C.R. 648 Date: 1920-03-08 McNichol; v. Burns 1920: February 11; 1920: March 8. Present:—Sir Louis Davies C.J. and Idington, Duff, Anglin, Brodeur and Mignault JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF ALBERTA. Negligence—Jury trial—Verdict—Inadequacy—Misdirection—Interference with an appeal. APPEAL from the judgment of the Supreme Court of Alberta, Appellate Division[1], affirming the judgment of the trial judge with a jury and maintaining the appellant's (plaintiff's) action. The action is for damages for the death of appellant's husband who was killed in a collision with a motor truck belonging to the respondent. The verdict of the jury, confirmed by the trial judge, awarded the appellant $2,450 damages. The grounds of appeal, before the Appellate Division and the Supreme Court of Canada were inadequacy of the verdict and misdirection by the trial judge. On the appeal by the plaintiff to the Supreme Court of Canada, the court, after hearing counsel for both parties, reserved judgment, and, at a subsequent date, dismissed the appeal with costs. Appeal dismissed with costs. R. B. Bennett K.C. for the appellant. A. H…

Read full judgment
McNichol v. Burns
Collection
Supreme Court Judgments
Date
1920-03-08
Report
(1920) 60 SCR 648
Judges
Davies, Louis Henry; Idington, John; Duff, Lyman Poore; Anglin, Francis Alexander; Brodeur, Louis-Philippe; Mignault, Pierre-Basile
On appeal from
Alberta
Subjects
Torts
Decision Content
Supreme Court of Canada
McNichol v. Burns, (1920) 60 S.C.R. 648
Date: 1920-03-08
McNichol;
v.
Burns
1920: February 11; 1920: March 8.
Present:—Sir Louis Davies C.J. and Idington, Duff, Anglin, Brodeur and Mignault JJ.
ON APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF ALBERTA.
Negligence—Jury trial—Verdict—Inadequacy—Misdirection—Interference with an appeal. APPEAL from the judgment of the Supreme Court of Alberta, Appellate Division[1], affirming the judgment of the trial judge with a jury and maintaining the appellant's (plaintiff's) action.
The action is for damages for the death of appellant's husband who was killed in a collision with a motor truck belonging to the respondent. The verdict of the jury, confirmed by the trial judge, awarded the appellant $2,450 damages. The grounds of appeal, before the Appellate Division and the Supreme Court of Canada were inadequacy of the verdict and misdirection by the trial judge.
On the appeal by the plaintiff to the Supreme Court of Canada, the court, after hearing counsel for both parties, reserved judgment, and, at a subsequent date, dismissed the appeal with costs.
Appeal dismissed with costs.
R. B. Bennett K.C. for the appellant.
A. H. Clarke K.C. for the respondent.
[1] 15 Alta. L.R.I; [1919] 3 W.W.R. 621; 49 D.L.R. 132.

Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca

Related cases