Hamilton Street Railway Co. v. Moran
Court headnote
Hamilton Street Railway Co. v. Moran Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1895-05-20 Report (1895) 24 SCR 717 Judges Henry, William Alexander; Strong, Samuel Henry; Taschereau, Henri-Elzéar; Gwynne, John Wellington; Sedgewick, Robert; King, George Edwin On appeal from Ontario Subjects Torts Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Hamilton Street Railway Co. v. Moran, (1895) 24 S.C.R. 717 Date: 1895-05-20 Hamilton Street Railway Co. and Moran. 1895: May 20. Present: Sir Henry Strong C.J., and Taschereau, Gwynne, Sedgewick and King JJ. Negligence—Street railway—Accident to workman on track—Contributory negligence. APPEAL from a decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, reversing the decision of the Divisional Court in favour of defendant company and ordering a new trial. The plaintiff was a workman in the employ of the company and was injured by a car striking him while working on the track. His action was to recover damages for such injury, and the company defended on the ground that he could have escaped being struck if he had been reasonably careful in looking out for cars passing the track. The trial judge gave judgment for the company holding that plaintiff was the cause of his own misfortune and could not hold defendants liable therefor. This judgment was affirmed by the Divisional Court but reversed by the Court of Appeal, which ordered a new trial. The Supreme Court, without reserving judgment, affirmed the decision of the Court of Appeal, Gwynne J. dissenting, a…
Read full judgment
Hamilton Street Railway Co. v. Moran Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1895-05-20 Report (1895) 24 SCR 717 Judges Henry, William Alexander; Strong, Samuel Henry; Taschereau, Henri-Elzéar; Gwynne, John Wellington; Sedgewick, Robert; King, George Edwin On appeal from Ontario Subjects Torts Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Hamilton Street Railway Co. v. Moran, (1895) 24 S.C.R. 717 Date: 1895-05-20 Hamilton Street Railway Co. and Moran. 1895: May 20. Present: Sir Henry Strong C.J., and Taschereau, Gwynne, Sedgewick and King JJ. Negligence—Street railway—Accident to workman on track—Contributory negligence. APPEAL from a decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, reversing the decision of the Divisional Court in favour of defendant company and ordering a new trial. The plaintiff was a workman in the employ of the company and was injured by a car striking him while working on the track. His action was to recover damages for such injury, and the company defended on the ground that he could have escaped being struck if he had been reasonably careful in looking out for cars passing the track. The trial judge gave judgment for the company holding that plaintiff was the cause of his own misfortune and could not hold defendants liable therefor. This judgment was affirmed by the Divisional Court but reversed by the Court of Appeal, which ordered a new trial. The Supreme Court, without reserving judgment, affirmed the decision of the Court of Appeal, Gwynne J. dissenting, and on counsel for the company stating that a new trial was not desired, judgment was ordered to be entered for plaintiff with $500 damages, the amount assessed by the jury at the trial. Appeal dismissed with costs. W. Nesbitt for the appellants. Staunton for the respondent.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca