Skip to main content
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal· 2005

Warman v. Winnicki

2005 CHRT 25
EvidenceJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Warman v. Winnicki Collection Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Date 2005-07-11 Neutral citation 2005 CHRT 25 File number(s) T1021/0205 Decision-maker(s) Jensen, Karen A. Decision type Decision Decision Content CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL TRIBUNAL CANADIEN DES DROITS DE LA PERSONNE RICHARD WARMAN Complainant - and - CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION Commission - and - TOMASZ WINNICKI Respondent RULING MEMBER: Karen A. Jensen 2005 CHRT 25 2005/07/11 [1] Richard Warman filed a complaint on September 7, 2003, with the Canadian Human Rights Commission (the Commission) against Tomasz Winnicki, alleging that Mr. Winnicki communicated or caused to be communicated messages which were likely to expose persons to hatred on the basis of religion. The Commission now seeks to amend the complaint to add the grounds of race, national or ethnic origin and colour. The complainant supports the amendment. [2] In his response to the motion, Mr. Winnicki stated that Mr. Warman and the Commission are persecuting him and that the motion to include the additional grounds of the complaint constitutes further evidence of this persecution. [3] The Tribunal has the discretion to amend a complaint to deal with additional grounds of discrimination and additional allegations provided that the substance of the original complaint is respected and that sufficient notice has been given to the respondent to enable him to properly defend himself (Warman v. Kyburz 2003 CHRT 6, at para 5). [4] I am satisfied that b…

Read full judgment
Warman v. Winnicki
Collection
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Date
2005-07-11
Neutral citation
2005 CHRT 25
File number(s)
T1021/0205
Decision-maker(s)
Jensen, Karen A.
Decision type
Decision
Decision Content
CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL TRIBUNAL CANADIEN DES DROITS DE LA PERSONNE
RICHARD WARMAN
Complainant
- and - CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
Commission
- and - TOMASZ WINNICKI
Respondent
RULING
MEMBER: Karen A. Jensen
2005 CHRT 25 2005/07/11
[1] Richard Warman filed a complaint on September 7, 2003, with the Canadian Human Rights Commission (the Commission) against Tomasz Winnicki, alleging that Mr. Winnicki communicated or caused to be communicated messages which were likely to expose persons to hatred on the basis of religion. The Commission now seeks to amend the complaint to add the grounds of race, national or ethnic origin and colour. The complainant supports the amendment.
[2] In his response to the motion, Mr. Winnicki stated that Mr. Warman and the Commission are persecuting him and that the motion to include the additional grounds of the complaint constitutes further evidence of this persecution.
[3] The Tribunal has the discretion to amend a complaint to deal with additional grounds of discrimination and additional allegations provided that the substance of the original complaint is respected and that sufficient notice has been given to the respondent to enable him to properly defend himself (Warman v. Kyburz 2003 CHRT 6, at para 5).
[4] I am satisfied that both of these conditions have been met in the present case. The proposed amendment is linked to the substance of the original complaint since the additional grounds relate to material that was allegedly communicated by Mr. Winnicki over the Internet.
[5] Moreover, there is nothing before me to indicate that Mr. Winnicki will be prejudiced in any way in the preparation of his defense if leave to amend the complaint is granted. Document disclosure, including the material that raised allegations based on the new grounds, was provided to Mr. Winnicki in April, 2005. In addition, in May, 2005, Mr. Winnicki received notice of the new grounds in the Joint Statement of Particulars and the Notice of Motion to amend the complaint.
[6] The hearing in this case is scheduled to begin on August 8, 2005. Therefore, Mr. Winnicki will have had three months to prepare a defense against the complaint based on the new grounds. This is sufficient notice to ensure that Mr. Winnicki is not prejudiced by the amendment.
[7] Accordingly, leave is granted to the Canadian Human Rights Commission to amend Mr. Warman's complaint to include the additional grounds of race, national or ethnic origin and colour in the s. 13(1) complaint against Mr. Tomasz Winnicki. The Commission shall have 10 days within which to serve and file an amended complaint form, together with an amended Statement of Particulars and any necessary supplementary disclosure.
Signed by Karen A. Jensen
OTTAWA, Ontario July 11, 2005
PARTIES OF RECORD
TRIBUNAL FILE:
T1021/0205
STYLE OF CAUSE:
Richard Warman v. Tomasz Winnicki
RULING OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED:
July 11, 2005
APPEARANCES:
Richard Warman
On his own behalf
Monette Maillet Ikram Warsame
On behalf of the Canadian Human Rights Commission
Tomasz Winnicki
On his own behalf

Source: decisions.chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

Related cases