Skip to main content
Supreme Court of Canada· 1899

Macdonald v. Riordan et al.

(1900) 30 SCR 619
ContractJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Macdonald v. Riordan et al. Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1899-11-07 Report (1900) 30 SCR 619 Judges Girouard, Désiré; Gwynne, John Wellington; King, George Edwin; Sedgewick, Robert; Strong, Samuel Henry On appeal from Quebec Subjects Constitutional law Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Macdonald v. Riordon et al (1899) 30 SCR 619 Date: 1899-11-07 MACDONALD v. RIORDON, et al. 1899: Oct 4; 1899: Oct 5; 1899: Nov 7 PRESENT:—Sir Henry Strong C.J. and Gwynne, Sedgewick, King and Grirouard JJ Constitutional law—Powers of Canadian Parliament—Prohibited contract—The Consolidated Railway Act 1879. APPEAL from the judgment of the Court of Queen's Bench for Lower Canada appeal side ([1]) which affirmed the judgment of the Court of Review at Montreal reversing the decision of the Superior Court, District of Montreal, and dismissing the plaintiff's action with costs, and also dismissing, but without costs an intervention filed by the Attorney-General for the Province of Quebec. After hearing counsel on behalf of the parties the court reserved judgment, and, on a subsequent day, dismissed the appeal with costs for the reasons given in the court appealed from. Appeal dismissed with costs. Fitzpatrick Q.C. and Beaudin Q.C. for the appellant. Lafleur Q.C. and Campbell Q.C for the respondent. [1] Q. R. 8 Q. B. 555. …

Read full judgment
Macdonald v. Riordan et al.
Collection
Supreme Court Judgments
Date
1899-11-07
Report
(1900) 30 SCR 619
Judges
Girouard, Désiré; Gwynne, John Wellington; King, George Edwin; Sedgewick, Robert; Strong, Samuel Henry
On appeal from
Quebec
Subjects
Constitutional law
Decision Content
Supreme Court of Canada
Macdonald v. Riordon et al (1899) 30 SCR 619
Date: 1899-11-07
MACDONALD v. RIORDON, et al.
1899: Oct 4; 1899: Oct 5; 1899: Nov 7
PRESENT:—Sir Henry Strong C.J. and Gwynne, Sedgewick, King and Grirouard JJ
Constitutional law—Powers of Canadian Parliament—Prohibited contract—The Consolidated Railway Act 1879.
APPEAL from the judgment of the Court of Queen's Bench for Lower Canada appeal side ([1]) which affirmed the judgment of the Court of Review at Montreal reversing the decision of the Superior Court, District of Montreal, and dismissing the plaintiff's action with costs, and also dismissing, but without costs an intervention filed by the Attorney-General for the Province of Quebec.
After hearing counsel on behalf of the parties the court reserved judgment, and, on a subsequent day, dismissed the appeal with costs for the reasons given in the court appealed from.
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Fitzpatrick Q.C. and Beaudin Q.C. for the appellant.
Lafleur Q.C. and Campbell Q.C for the respondent.
[1] Q. R. 8 Q. B. 555.

Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca

Related cases