McFadyen v. Canada (Attorney General)
Source text
McFadyen v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2006-01-10 Neutral citation 2006 FCA 11 File numbers A-312-05 Decision Content Date: 20060110 Docket: A-312-05 Citation: 2006 FCA 11 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. NOËL J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: NEIL McFADYEN Appellant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on January 10, 2006. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on January 10, 2006. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: SHARLOW J.A. Date: 20060110 Docket: A-312-05 Citation: 2006 FCA 11 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. NOËL J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: NEIL McFADYEN Appellant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on January 10, 2006.) SHARLOW J.A. [1] Notwithstanding the thorough submissions of the appellant, we are all of the view that the appellant's complaints under the Canadian Human Rights Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. H-6, cannot possibly succeed in the face of the decision of this Court that the statutory provisions relating to the GST rebate do not offend section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: McFadyen v. Canada, [2001] 1 C.T.C. 140, 2001 D.T.C. 5055 (F.C.A.), confirming [2000] 2 C.T.C. 2777 (T.C.C.). We see no relevant distinction between that legislation and the legislation relating to the fuel tax rebate. This appeal will accordingly be dismissed with costs. "K. Sharlow" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NA…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
McFadyen v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2006-01-10 Neutral citation 2006 FCA 11 File numbers A-312-05 Decision Content Date: 20060110 Docket: A-312-05 Citation: 2006 FCA 11 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. NOËL J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: NEIL McFADYEN Appellant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on January 10, 2006. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on January 10, 2006. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: SHARLOW J.A. Date: 20060110 Docket: A-312-05 Citation: 2006 FCA 11 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. NOËL J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: NEIL McFADYEN Appellant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on January 10, 2006.) SHARLOW J.A. [1] Notwithstanding the thorough submissions of the appellant, we are all of the view that the appellant's complaints under the Canadian Human Rights Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. H-6, cannot possibly succeed in the face of the decision of this Court that the statutory provisions relating to the GST rebate do not offend section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: McFadyen v. Canada, [2001] 1 C.T.C. 140, 2001 D.T.C. 5055 (F.C.A.), confirming [2000] 2 C.T.C. 2777 (T.C.C.). We see no relevant distinction between that legislation and the legislation relating to the fuel tax rebate. This appeal will accordingly be dismissed with costs. "K. Sharlow" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-312-05 STYLE OF CAUSE: NEIL MCFADYEN Appellant v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: January 10, 2006 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: ROTHSTEIN, NOËL & SHARLOW JJ.A. RENDERED FROM THE BENCH BY: SHARLOW J.A. APPEARANCES: Neil McFadyen APPELLANT ON HIS OWN BEHALF Richard Casanova FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Neil McFadyen Ottawa, Ontario APPELLANT ON HIS OWN BEHALF John H. Sims, Q.C. FOR THE RESPONDENT Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Ontario
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
Multani v Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys
[2006] 1 SCR 256