Gebele v. Canada
Source text
Gebele v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2006-10-17 Neutral citation 2006 FCA 333 File numbers A-4-06 Decision Content Date: 20061017 Docket: A-4-06 Citation: 2006 FCA 333 CORAM: LINDEN J.A. NADON J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: HERMAN GEBELE Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on October 17, 2006. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on October 17, 2006. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: MALONE J.A. Date: 20061017 Docket: A-4-06 Citation: 2006 FCA 333 CORAM: LINDEN J.A. NADON J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: HERMAN GEBELE Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on October 17, 2006) MALONE J.A. [1] We are all satisfied that the Tax Court Judge did not commit any legal or factual errors that would warrant our intervention. [2] Based on the evidence, there was no basis upon which the time for extending the service of the Notice of Objections for the 1988 to 1994 tax years pursuant to paragraph 166.2(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act could be extended. [3] The respondent sought and should receive its costs. “B. Malone” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-4-06 (APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUDGE SHERIDAN, TAX COURT OF CANADA DATED DECEMBER 9, 2005, DOCKET NO. 2004-3293(IT)) STYLE OF CAUSE: HERMAN GEBELE v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO DAT…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Gebele v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2006-10-17 Neutral citation 2006 FCA 333 File numbers A-4-06 Decision Content Date: 20061017 Docket: A-4-06 Citation: 2006 FCA 333 CORAM: LINDEN J.A. NADON J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: HERMAN GEBELE Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on October 17, 2006. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on October 17, 2006. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: MALONE J.A. Date: 20061017 Docket: A-4-06 Citation: 2006 FCA 333 CORAM: LINDEN J.A. NADON J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: HERMAN GEBELE Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on October 17, 2006) MALONE J.A. [1] We are all satisfied that the Tax Court Judge did not commit any legal or factual errors that would warrant our intervention. [2] Based on the evidence, there was no basis upon which the time for extending the service of the Notice of Objections for the 1988 to 1994 tax years pursuant to paragraph 166.2(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act could be extended. [3] The respondent sought and should receive its costs. “B. Malone” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-4-06 (APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUDGE SHERIDAN, TAX COURT OF CANADA DATED DECEMBER 9, 2005, DOCKET NO. 2004-3293(IT)) STYLE OF CAUSE: HERMAN GEBELE v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO DATE OF HEARING: October 17, 2006 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: Linden, Nadon & Malone JJ.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: Malone J.A. APPEARANCES: George Gligoric FOR THE APPELLANT Donna Dorosh Kandria Airde FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: George Gligoric Hamilton, Ontario FOR THE APPELLANT John H. Sims,Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada Toronto, Ontario FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
Démocratie en surveillance c. Canada (Procureur général)
2024 CAF 75