Drolet v. Canada
Court headnote
Drolet v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2003-01-08 Neutral citation 2003 FCA 7 File numbers A-377-02 Decision Content Date: 20030108 Docket: A-377-02 Ottawa, Ontario, January 8, 2003 Present: Nadon J.A. BETWEEN: JEAN-CLAUDE DROLET Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent ORDER The motion by the respondent for leave (i) to adduce in evidence a decision of the Minister of Veterans Affairs dated August 9, 2002; and (ii) to file a supplementary memorandum of law is dismissed with costs. "M. Nadon" J.A. Certified true translation Mary Jo Egan, LLB Date: 20030108 Docket: A-377-02 Neutral Citation: 2003 FCA 7 BETWEEN: JEAN-CLAUDE DROLET Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Motion in writing decided without appearance by the parties Order made at Ottawa, Ontario, on January 8, 2003 REASONS FOR ORDER: NADON J.A. Date: 20030108 Docket: A-377-02 Neutral Citation: 2003 FCA 7 BETWEEN: JEAN-CLAUDE DROLET Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER NADON J.A. [1] The respondent seeks to introduce fresh evidence: a decision of the Minister of Veterans Affairs dated August 9, 2002. The respondent submits that the decision is relevant because its effect is to terminate the stay order made by Madam Justice Tremblay-Lamer on June 5, 2002. [2] In my view, because the appellant is challenging the merits of the order of Tremblay-Lamer J. by way of appeal, the fresh evidence that the respondent seeks to introduce is completely i…
Read full judgment
Drolet v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2003-01-08 Neutral citation 2003 FCA 7 File numbers A-377-02 Decision Content Date: 20030108 Docket: A-377-02 Ottawa, Ontario, January 8, 2003 Present: Nadon J.A. BETWEEN: JEAN-CLAUDE DROLET Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent ORDER The motion by the respondent for leave (i) to adduce in evidence a decision of the Minister of Veterans Affairs dated August 9, 2002; and (ii) to file a supplementary memorandum of law is dismissed with costs. "M. Nadon" J.A. Certified true translation Mary Jo Egan, LLB Date: 20030108 Docket: A-377-02 Neutral Citation: 2003 FCA 7 BETWEEN: JEAN-CLAUDE DROLET Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Motion in writing decided without appearance by the parties Order made at Ottawa, Ontario, on January 8, 2003 REASONS FOR ORDER: NADON J.A. Date: 20030108 Docket: A-377-02 Neutral Citation: 2003 FCA 7 BETWEEN: JEAN-CLAUDE DROLET Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER NADON J.A. [1] The respondent seeks to introduce fresh evidence: a decision of the Minister of Veterans Affairs dated August 9, 2002. The respondent submits that the decision is relevant because its effect is to terminate the stay order made by Madam Justice Tremblay-Lamer on June 5, 2002. [2] In my view, because the appellant is challenging the merits of the order of Tremblay-Lamer J. by way of appeal, the fresh evidence that the respondent seeks to introduce is completely irrelevant. [3] Accordingly, the respondent's motion will be dismissed with costs. "M. Nadon" J.A. Certified true translation Mary Jo Egan, LLB FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA APPEAL DIVISION SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-377-02 STYLE OF CAUSE: Jean-Claude Drolet v. Her Majesty the Queen PLACE OF HEARING: Motion in writing without appearance by the parties REASONS BY: Nadon J.A. DATED: January 8, 2003 WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS BY: Jacques Ferron FOR THE APPELLANT Vincent Veilleux FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Jacques Ferron FOR THE APPELLANT Morris Rosenberg FOR THE RESPONDENT Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca