R. v. Szlovak
Court headnote
R. v. Szlovak Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1989-11-28 Report [1989] 2 SCR 1114 Case number 21464 Judges Dickson, Robert George Brian; Lamer, Antonio; Wilson, Bertha; La Forest, Gérard V.; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Cory, Peter deCarteret; McLachlin, Beverley On appeal from Alberta Subjects Constitutional law Notes SCC Case Information: 21464 Decision Content R. v. Szlovak, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 1114 Leslie Steven Szlovak Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent Indexed as: R. v. Szlovak File No.: 21464. 1989: November 28. Present: Dickson C.J. and Lamer, Wilson, La Forest, L'Heureux‑Dubé, Cory and McLachlin JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for alberta Constitutional law ‑‑ Charter of Rights ‑‑ Admissibility of evidence ‑‑ Bringing administration of justice into disrepute ‑‑ Robbery ‑‑ Trial judge excluding from evidence the money seized from the accused and the statement made by him to the police ‑‑ Whether trial judge erred in excluding the evidence ‑‑ Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s. 24 . APPEAL from a judgment of the Alberta Court of Appeal (1989), 96 A.R. 73, setting aside the accused's acquittal on a charge of robbery and ordering a new trial. Appeal dismissed. Terence C. Semenuk, for the appellant. Lindsay MacDonald, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by The Chief Justice ‑‑ This is an appeal as of right. We are not persuaded that there was error on the part of the Albert Court of Appeal. The appeal is accordingly …
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.scc-csc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
R. v. Szlovak Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1989-11-28 Report [1989] 2 SCR 1114 Case number 21464 Judges Dickson, Robert George Brian; Lamer, Antonio; Wilson, Bertha; La Forest, Gérard V.; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Cory, Peter deCarteret; McLachlin, Beverley On appeal from Alberta Subjects Constitutional law Notes SCC Case Information: 21464 Decision Content R. v. Szlovak, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 1114 Leslie Steven Szlovak Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent Indexed as: R. v. Szlovak File No.: 21464. 1989: November 28. Present: Dickson C.J. and Lamer, Wilson, La Forest, L'Heureux‑Dubé, Cory and McLachlin JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for alberta Constitutional law ‑‑ Charter of Rights ‑‑ Admissibility of evidence ‑‑ Bringing administration of justice into disrepute ‑‑ Robbery ‑‑ Trial judge excluding from evidence the money seized from the accused and the statement made by him to the police ‑‑ Whether trial judge erred in excluding the evidence ‑‑ Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s. 24 . APPEAL from a judgment of the Alberta Court of Appeal (1989), 96 A.R. 73, setting aside the accused's acquittal on a charge of robbery and ordering a new trial. Appeal dismissed. Terence C. Semenuk, for the appellant. Lindsay MacDonald, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by The Chief Justice ‑‑ This is an appeal as of right. We are not persuaded that there was error on the part of the Albert Court of Appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. Judgment accordingly. Solicitors for the appellant: Singleton Urquhart MacDonald, Calgary. Solicitor for the respondent: The Attorney General for Alberta, Edmonton.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca
Multani v Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys
[2006] 1 SCR 256