Wonderfarm Biscuits & Confectionary SDN BHD v. Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Wonderfarm Biscuits & Confectionary SDN BHD v. Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Court (s) Database
Federal Court Decisions
Date
2011-02-01
Neutral citation
2011 FC 117
File numbers
T-942-10
Decision Content
Federal Court
Cour fédérale
Date: 20110201
Docket: T-942-10
Citation: 2011 FC 117
Ottawa, Ontario, February 1, 2011
PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Hughes
BETWEEN:
WONDERFARM BISCUITS & CONFECTIONARY SDN BHD
Applicant/
Appellant
and
BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS LLP
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT
[1] This is an appeal taken under section 56 of the Trade-marks Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. T-13 in respect of a decision of the Registrar of Trade-marks to expunge Canadian Trade-mark Registration No. 504,780 for all but a few wares. For the reasons that follow, I will restore that registration except for the wares “bread, pastries and spices.”
[2] The Trade-marks Office was dealing with a request made by the Respondent under section 45 of the Trade-marks Act that the Registrant, the Applicant/Appellant, furnish evidence as to the use of the trade-mark for the wares as registered. Evidence was filed which the Registrar’s delegate found to be unsatisfactory, except for the wares “preparations made from cereals, namely biscuits, wafers and cookies”. Accordingly, the balance of the registration, except as to these wares, was expunged by a decision dated April 16, 2010.
[3] The Applicant brought this appeal and provided substantial new evidence which satisfies me that the registration, as amended October 1, 2008, should be restored except for the deletion of wares being “bread, pastries and spices”. The Respondent is in agreement.
[4] The law in respect of appeals such as this has been well summarized by the Chief Justice of this Court in his recent decision, 1459243 Ontario Inc. v. Eva Gabor International Ltd. 2011 FC 18. I will not repeat that summary.
[5] Accordingly, Trade-mark Registration No. 504,780 will be restored, in part, such that the statement of wares should now read as follows:
Preserved, dried, cooked and stewed fruits; canned mushrooms (preserved); coconut cream, coconut milk, coconut water, green grass jelly, grass jelly fruit juice, non-alcoholic, non-carbonated beverages; coffee, tea, preparations made from cereal, namely biscuits, wafers, cookies; mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks, namely teas, coffees, non-carbonated fruit based beverages and non-carbonated beverages made primarily of natural ingredients; fruit drinks, namely non-alcoholic and non-carbonated fruit based beverages.
[6] I am satisfied that the Respondent is entitled to costs, particularly since the Appellant should have filed proper evidence in the Trade-marks Office and not undertaken an appeal in order to do so. Costs are fixed in the sum of two thousand ($2,000.00) dollars.
JUDGMENT
FOR THE REASONS PROVIDED:
THE COURT ORDERS AND ADJUDGES that:
1. Canadian Trade-mark Registration No. 504,780 is restored in part such that the statement of wares is as follows:
Preserved, dried, cooked and stewed fruits; canned mushrooms (preserved); coconut cream, coconut milk, coconut water, green grass jelly, grass jelly, fruit juice, non-alcoholic, non-carbonated beverages; coffee, tea, preparations made from cereal, namely biscuits, wafers, cookies; mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks, namely teas, coffees, non-carbonated fruit based beverages and non-carbonated beverages made primarily of natural ingredients; fruit drinks, namely non-alcoholic and non-carbonated fruit based beverages.
2. The Respondent is entitled to costs fixed in the sum of two thousand ($2,000.00) dollars.
"Roger T. Hughes"
Judge
FEDERAL COURT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: T-942-10
STYLE OF CAUSE: WONDERFARM BISCUITS & CONFECTIONARY SDN BHD v. BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS LLP
PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa
DATE OF HEARING: February 1, 2011
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT: HUGHES J.
DATED: February 1, 2011
APPEARANCES:
Robert MacDonald
FOR THE APPLICANT
Hafeez Rupani
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Gowling Lafleur Henderson
Barristers & Solicitors
Ottawa, Ontario
FOR THE APPLICANT
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Barristers & Solicitors
Ottawa, Ontario
FOR THE RESPONDENT