Canada (Border Services Agency) v. Grodan Inc.

Canada (Border Services Agency) v. Grodan Inc.
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2013-05-01
Neutral citation
2013 FCA 121
File numbers
A-381-12
Decision Content
Date: 20130501
Docket: A-381-12
Citation: 2013 FCA 121
CORAM: NOËL J.A.
MAINVILLE J.A.
NEAR J.A.
BETWEEN:
THE PRESIDENT OF THE CANADA BORDER SERVICES AGENCY
Appellant
and
GRODAN INC.
Respondent
Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on May 1, 2013.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on May 1, 2013.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NOËL J.A.
Date: 20130501
Docket: A-381-12
Citation: 2013 FCA 121
CORAM: NOËL J.A.
MAINVILLE J.A.
NEAR J.A.
BETWEEN:
THE PRESIDENT OF THE CANADA BORDER SERVICES AGENCY
Appellant
and
GRODAN INC.
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on May 1, 2013)
NOËL J.A.
[1] The President of the Canada Border Services Agency (the appellant) brings on appeal a decision of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the CITT) wherein the CITT concluded that the goods imported by Grodan Inc. fell under tariff item No. 9903.00.00 and thereby benefit from duty-free treatment.
[2] The appellant contends that the decision reached by the CITT is unreasonable, and asks that the original classification denying the duty-free treatment of the subject goods be restored.
[3] Applying a standard of reasonableness we are unable to conclude that the CITT erred in holding that the polyethylene film or sheeting which are used exclusively as covering material for greenhouse structures and for greenhouse flooring benefit from duty-free treatment under tariff
No. 9903.00.00 as “articles and materials that enter into the cost of manufacturer or repair of agricultural or horticultural machines of heading No. 84.36”.
[4] The appeal will therefore be dismissed with costs.
“Marc Noël”
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-381-12
STYLE OF CAUSE: THE PRESIDENT OF THE CANADA BORDER SERVICES AGENCY and GRODAN INC.
PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa, Ontario
DATE OF HEARING: May 1, 2013
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: Noël, Mainville, Near JJ.A.
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: Noël J.A.
APPEARANCES:
Andrew Gibbs
FOR THE APPELLANT
Michael Kaylor
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
William F. Pentney
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
FOR THE APPELLANT
Corporate Efficiency Consulting Inc.
Burlington, Ontario
FOR THE RESPONDENT