United Scottish Cultural Society v. Canada (Customs and Revenue Agency)

United Scottish Cultural Society v. Canada (Customs and Revenue Agency)
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2004-09-30
Neutral citation
2004 FCA 324
File numbers
A-20-04
Decision Content
Date: 20040930
Docket: A-20-04
Citation: 2004 FCA 324
PRESENT: NOËL J.A.
BETWEEN:
UNITED SCOTTISH CULTURAL SOCIETY
Appellant
and
CANADA CUSTOMS AND REVENUE AGENCY
Respondent
Dealt with in writing without appearance of parties.
Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario on September 30, 2004.
REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NOËL J.A.
Date: 20040930
Docket: A-20-04
Citation: 2004 FCA 324
PRESENT: NOËL J.A.
BETWEEN:
UNITED SCOTTISH CULTURAL SOCIETY
Appellant
and
CANADA CUSTOMS AND REVENUE AGENCY
Respondent
REASONS FOR ORDER
NOËL J.A.
[1] The applicant seeks leave to adduce new evidence on appeal by filing the affidavit of Duncan MacKenzie.
[2] It is apparent that the new evidence which forms the subject matter of this affidavit could have been discovered with reasonable diligence. What the affiant attempts to do in this affidavit is simply to improve upon the information and the responses which were provided to the staff of the Charities Directorate, Canada Customs and Revenue Agency, in the process which led to the decision under appeal. The respondent submits that the Court need go no further to dismiss this application
[3] Nevertheless, the applicant maintains in its reply submission that the present case "is parallel" to the decision of this Court in Humanist Association of Toronto v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2002 DTC 7380 where Sharlow J.A. allowed for the submission of new evidence. Like the appellant in that case, the applicant contends that it did not know the basis for the Minister's decision until the decision was rendered and the record upon which the decision was reached was communicated to it.
[4] However, the allegation in the case decided by Sharlow J.A. was that some documents that were before the Minister had not been submitted by the appellant and had not been disclosed to the appellant until the decision had been reached. That is the context in which Sharlow J.A. allowed the appellant to file further evidence.
[5] No such issue arises here. The applicant is at the source of the information which it now wishes to correct or clarify. It knew or ought to have known that the information which it provided to the Department officials would be considered in dealing with the application to have its charitable status reinstated. What the applicant asks is that it be given a second chance to place before the Court the record which it ought to have tendered in the first instance. That is not a proper use of the appeal process.
[6] The application will be dismissed with costs.
"Marc Noël"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-20-04
STYLE OF CAUSE: United Scottish Cultural Society and Canada Customs and
Revenue Agency
MOTION DEALT WITH IN WRITING WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF PARTIES
REASONS FOR ORDER BY: Noël J.A.
DATED: September 30, 2004
WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY:
Maureen E. Baird
FOR THE APPELLANT
Lynn M. Burch
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Lawson Lundell
Vancouver, British Columbia
FOR THE APPELLANT
Mr. Morris Rosenberg
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Ottawa, Ontario
FOR THE RESPONDENT