Stoyek v. Canada (Attorney General)
Source text
Stoyek v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2017-11-15 Neutral citation 2017 FCA 223 File numbers A-43-17 Decision Content Date: 20171115 Docket: A-43-17 Citation: 2017 FCA 223 CORAM: NADON J.A. NEAR J.A. LASKIN J.A. BETWEEN: PETER BRIAN STOYEK Appellant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 15, 2017. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 15, 2017. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON J.A. Date: 20171115 Docket: A-43-17 Citation: 2017 FCA 223 CORAM: NADON J.A. NEAR J.A. LASKIN J.A. BETWEEN: PETER BRIAN STOYEK Appellant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 15, 2017). NADON J.A. [1] Regretfully for the appellant, we have not been persuaded, notwithstanding Mr. Ghignone’s forceful arguments, that the Federal Court (2017 FC 47) erred in refusing to interfere with the decision of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board, constituted as the Entitlement Reconsideration Panel. [2] More particularly, it is our view that the Reconsideration Panel made no error in its determination that there was no basis to interfere with the first panel’s (the Appeal Panel) decision that the appellant was entitled to receive an exceptional incapacity allowance under section 72 of the Pension Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. P-6 as of March 1, 2011 rather than February 17, 2009. [3] On the evidence…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Stoyek v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2017-11-15 Neutral citation 2017 FCA 223 File numbers A-43-17 Decision Content Date: 20171115 Docket: A-43-17 Citation: 2017 FCA 223 CORAM: NADON J.A. NEAR J.A. LASKIN J.A. BETWEEN: PETER BRIAN STOYEK Appellant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 15, 2017. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 15, 2017. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON J.A. Date: 20171115 Docket: A-43-17 Citation: 2017 FCA 223 CORAM: NADON J.A. NEAR J.A. LASKIN J.A. BETWEEN: PETER BRIAN STOYEK Appellant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 15, 2017). NADON J.A. [1] Regretfully for the appellant, we have not been persuaded, notwithstanding Mr. Ghignone’s forceful arguments, that the Federal Court (2017 FC 47) erred in refusing to interfere with the decision of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board, constituted as the Entitlement Reconsideration Panel. [2] More particularly, it is our view that the Reconsideration Panel made no error in its determination that there was no basis to interfere with the first panel’s (the Appeal Panel) decision that the appellant was entitled to receive an exceptional incapacity allowance under section 72 of the Pension Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. P-6 as of March 1, 2011 rather than February 17, 2009. [3] On the evidence before the Reconsideration Panel, it cannot be said, in our respectful view, that its conclusion is unreasonable or that it is the result of an error of law. [4] For these reasons, the appeal will be dismissed. "M Nadon" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD Docket: A-43-17 (APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANNIS OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA DATED JANUARY 13, 2017 DOCKET NO. T-807-16) STYLE OF CAUSE: PETER BRIAN STOYEK v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: November 15, 2017 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON J.A. NEAR J.A. LASKIN J.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: NADON J.A. APPEARANCES: Roberto Ghignone Marion Unrau For The Appellant Patrick Bendin For The Respondent SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Borden Ladner Gervais LLP Ottawa, Ontario For The Appellant Nathalie G. Drouin Deputy Attorney General of Canada For The Respondent
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
Démocratie en surveillance c. Canada (Procureur général)
2024 CAF 75