Boland v. Matachewan Canadian Gold, Ltd.
Court headnote
Boland v. Matachewan Canadian Gold, Ltd. Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1959-12-02 Report [1960] SCR 360 On appeal from Ontario Subjects Evidence Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Boland v. Matachewan Canadian Gold, Ltd., [1960] S.C.R. 360 Date: 1959-12-02 J. F. Boland Appellant; and Matachewan Canadian Gold, Ltd. Respondent. ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO. The following oral judgment was delivered by the Chief Justice on December 2, 1959: "Accepting the appellant's contention that the onus was upon the respondent to show payment, we are all of opinion that there was evidence upon which the trial judge could decide as he did. We are also of opinion that, in the circumstances, he did not err in refusing to accept, particularly at the stage of the trial at which it was offered, the letter from Mr. Sutherland to the late Mr. Boland, nor in refusing to permit the appellant to call Mr. Sutherland as a witness. The appeal is dismissed with costs. …
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.scc-csc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Boland v. Matachewan Canadian Gold, Ltd. Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1959-12-02 Report [1960] SCR 360 On appeal from Ontario Subjects Evidence Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Boland v. Matachewan Canadian Gold, Ltd., [1960] S.C.R. 360 Date: 1959-12-02 J. F. Boland Appellant; and Matachewan Canadian Gold, Ltd. Respondent. ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO. The following oral judgment was delivered by the Chief Justice on December 2, 1959: "Accepting the appellant's contention that the onus was upon the respondent to show payment, we are all of opinion that there was evidence upon which the trial judge could decide as he did. We are also of opinion that, in the circumstances, he did not err in refusing to accept, particularly at the stage of the trial at which it was offered, the letter from Mr. Sutherland to the late Mr. Boland, nor in refusing to permit the appellant to call Mr. Sutherland as a witness. The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca
Démocratie en surveillance c. Canada (Procureur général)
2024 CAF 75