Alcozai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
Source text
Alcozai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2008-03-27 Neutral citation 2008 FC 396 File numbers IMM-1573-07 Decision Content Date: 20080327 Docket: IMM-1573-07 Citation: 2008 FC 396 Toronto, Ontario, March 27, 2008 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Campbell BETWEEN: NASREEN ALCOZAI Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER [1] The present Application concerns an application for permanent resettlement in Canada by the principal applicant, Ms. Alcozai, and her husband. The Visa Officer who conducted the interview process made a clear finding that a stark contradiction in the evidence of the principal applicant’s husband constitutes a breach of s.16(1) of the IRPA because he did not answer truthfully all the questions put to him. It is not contested that no similar finding was made with respect to the principal applicant. [2] The decision under review is in the form of a letter dated November 8, 2006, addressed to the principal applicant with the result being stated that her application for permanent resettlement in Canada is refused (Tribunal Record, p.4). In my opinion, the decision is, on its face, fundamentally flawed. [3] The decision purports to refuse the principal applicant’s application on the reason that: You have been unable or unwilling to resolve discrepancies and contradictions in the information you have provided about your military service, particularly w…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Alcozai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2008-03-27 Neutral citation 2008 FC 396 File numbers IMM-1573-07 Decision Content Date: 20080327 Docket: IMM-1573-07 Citation: 2008 FC 396 Toronto, Ontario, March 27, 2008 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Campbell BETWEEN: NASREEN ALCOZAI Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER [1] The present Application concerns an application for permanent resettlement in Canada by the principal applicant, Ms. Alcozai, and her husband. The Visa Officer who conducted the interview process made a clear finding that a stark contradiction in the evidence of the principal applicant’s husband constitutes a breach of s.16(1) of the IRPA because he did not answer truthfully all the questions put to him. It is not contested that no similar finding was made with respect to the principal applicant. [2] The decision under review is in the form of a letter dated November 8, 2006, addressed to the principal applicant with the result being stated that her application for permanent resettlement in Canada is refused (Tribunal Record, p.4). In my opinion, the decision is, on its face, fundamentally flawed. [3] The decision purports to refuse the principal applicant’s application on the reason that: You have been unable or unwilling to resolve discrepancies and contradictions in the information you have provided about your military service, particularly with reference to the situation in Kunar province, your knowledge of the taking of prisoners of war, and your involvement in combat. Obviously, this critical finding is made with respect to the principal applicant’s spouse’s evidence and has nothing whatever to do with the principal applicant’s evidence. As a result, I find that the decision is made in reviewable error. ORDER Accordingly, I set aside the decision under review and refer the matter back to a different visa officer for re-determination. “Douglas R. Campbell” Judge FEDERAL COURT NAME OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-1573-07 STYLE OF CAUSE: NASREEN ALCOZAI v. THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: MARCH 27, 2008 REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER BY: CAMPBELL J. DATED: MARCH 27, 2008 APPEARANCES: Mehran Youssefi FOR THE APPLICANT Michael Butterfield FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Mehran Youssefi Barrister & Solicitor Toronto, Ontario FOR THE APPLICANT John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca
Démocratie en surveillance c. Canada (Procureur général)
2024 CAF 75