Canada (Minister of Public Works and Government Services) v. Maxsys Professionals & Solutions Inc.
Source text
Canada (Minister of Public Works and Government Services) v. Maxsys Professionals & Solutions Inc. Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2003-05-07 Neutral citation 2003 FCA 214 File numbers A-366-02 Decision Content Date: 20030507 Docket: A-366-02 Citation: 2003 FCA 214 CORAM: STONE J.A. SEXTON J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: MINISTER OF PUBLIC WORKS AND GOVERNMENT SERVICES Applicant and MAXSYS PROFESSIONALS & SOLUTIONS INC. Respondent Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, May 7, 2003 Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, May 7, 2003 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: SHARLOW J.A. Date: 20030507 Docket: A-366-02 Citation: 2003 FCA 214 CORAM: STONE J.A. SEXTON J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: MINISTER OF PUBLIC WORKS AND GOVERNMENT SERVICES Applicant and MAXSYS PROFESSIONALS & SOLUTIONS INC. Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, May 7, 2003 SHARLOW J.A. [1] The Crown seeks to quash a decision of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal accepting as valid a complaint by the respondent relating to the procurement of professional services for the Department of National Defence. [2] The issues argued before the CITT and this Court were essentially factual, relating to the quality of the respondent as a bidder. We agree with the respondent that the appropriate standard of review is patent unreasonableness. [3] After considering the written and oral submissions of the parties, we are not persuaded that the CITT m…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Canada (Minister of Public Works and Government Services) v. Maxsys Professionals & Solutions Inc. Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2003-05-07 Neutral citation 2003 FCA 214 File numbers A-366-02 Decision Content Date: 20030507 Docket: A-366-02 Citation: 2003 FCA 214 CORAM: STONE J.A. SEXTON J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: MINISTER OF PUBLIC WORKS AND GOVERNMENT SERVICES Applicant and MAXSYS PROFESSIONALS & SOLUTIONS INC. Respondent Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, May 7, 2003 Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, May 7, 2003 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: SHARLOW J.A. Date: 20030507 Docket: A-366-02 Citation: 2003 FCA 214 CORAM: STONE J.A. SEXTON J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: MINISTER OF PUBLIC WORKS AND GOVERNMENT SERVICES Applicant and MAXSYS PROFESSIONALS & SOLUTIONS INC. Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, May 7, 2003 SHARLOW J.A. [1] The Crown seeks to quash a decision of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal accepting as valid a complaint by the respondent relating to the procurement of professional services for the Department of National Defence. [2] The issues argued before the CITT and this Court were essentially factual, relating to the quality of the respondent as a bidder. We agree with the respondent that the appropriate standard of review is patent unreasonableness. [3] After considering the written and oral submissions of the parties, we are not persuaded that the CITT made any error that warrants the intervention of this Court. [4] This application will therefore be dismissed with costs. "K. Sharlow" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-366-02 STYLE OF CAUSE: MINISTER OF PUBLIC WORKS AND GOVERNMENT SERVICES v. MAXSYS PROFESSIONALS & SOLUTIONS INC PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: May 7, 2003 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: (Stone, Sexton, Sharlow, JJA.) RENDERED FROM THE BENCH BY: (Sharlow, J.A.) APPEARANCES: Mr. David M. Attwater FOR THE APPLICANT Mr. Ronald D. Lunau. FOR THE RESPONDENT Ms. Carina Depellegrin SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Lang Michener FOR THE APPLICANT Ottawa, Ontario Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP FOR THE RESPONDENT Ottawa, Ontario
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca