Bruce v. The Queen
Court headnote
Bruce v. The Queen Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1985-10-29 Report [1985] 2 SCR 287 Case number 16983 Judges Dickson, Robert George Brian; Beetz, Jean; Chouinard, Julien; Lamer, Antonio; Wilson, Bertha; Le Dain, Gerald Eric; La Forest, Gérard V. On appeal from Ontario Subjects Evidence Notes SCC Case Information: 16983 Decision Content Bruce v. The Queen, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 287 Alvin Harper Bruce Appellant; and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent. File No.: 16983. 1985: October 29. Present: Dickson C.J. and Beetz, Chouinard, Lamer, Wilson, Le Dain and La Forest JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for ontario Evidence ‑‑ Documentary evidence ‑‑ Reception ‑‑ Banking transactions ‑‑ Whether computer produced bank statements admissible under s. 29(1) , (2) of the Canada Evidence Act . APPEAL from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal, sub nom. R. v. Bell and Bruce (1982), 35 O.R. (2d) 164, 65 C.C.C. (2d) 376, 26 C.R. (3d) 336, allowing the Crown's appeal from the acquittal of the accused on a charge of fraud. Appeal dismissed. Shane M. Watson, for the appellant. J. Douglas Ewart, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by 1. The Chief Justice‑‑It will not be necessary to call upon you Mr. Ewart. We agree with the conclusion of the Court of Appeal for Ontario and with the reasons for judgment delivered by Weatherston J.A. for the Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Judgment accordingly. Solicitor for the appellant: Shane M. Watson, Ha…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.scc-csc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Bruce v. The Queen Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1985-10-29 Report [1985] 2 SCR 287 Case number 16983 Judges Dickson, Robert George Brian; Beetz, Jean; Chouinard, Julien; Lamer, Antonio; Wilson, Bertha; Le Dain, Gerald Eric; La Forest, Gérard V. On appeal from Ontario Subjects Evidence Notes SCC Case Information: 16983 Decision Content Bruce v. The Queen, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 287 Alvin Harper Bruce Appellant; and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent. File No.: 16983. 1985: October 29. Present: Dickson C.J. and Beetz, Chouinard, Lamer, Wilson, Le Dain and La Forest JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for ontario Evidence ‑‑ Documentary evidence ‑‑ Reception ‑‑ Banking transactions ‑‑ Whether computer produced bank statements admissible under s. 29(1) , (2) of the Canada Evidence Act . APPEAL from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal, sub nom. R. v. Bell and Bruce (1982), 35 O.R. (2d) 164, 65 C.C.C. (2d) 376, 26 C.R. (3d) 336, allowing the Crown's appeal from the acquittal of the accused on a charge of fraud. Appeal dismissed. Shane M. Watson, for the appellant. J. Douglas Ewart, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by 1. The Chief Justice‑‑It will not be necessary to call upon you Mr. Ewart. We agree with the conclusion of the Court of Appeal for Ontario and with the reasons for judgment delivered by Weatherston J.A. for the Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Judgment accordingly. Solicitor for the appellant: Shane M. Watson, Hamilton. Solicitor for the respondent: Archie G. Campbell, Toronto.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca
Démocratie en surveillance c. Canada (Procureur général)
2024 CAF 75