Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2008

Mohawks v. Commandant

2008 FCA 195
EvidenceJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Mohawks v. Commandant Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2008-05-29 Neutral citation 2008 FCA 195 File numbers A-423-07 Decision Content Date: 20080529 Docket: A-423-07 Citation: 2008 FCA 195 CORAM: LINDEN J.A. NADON J.A. SEXTON J.A. BETWEEN: WAHTA MOHAWKS Appellant and KAREN COMMANDANT Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on May 29, 2008. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on May 29, 2008. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: LINDEN J.A. Date: 20080529 Docket: A-423-07 Citation: 2008 FCA 195 CORAM: LINDEN J.A. NADON J.A. SEXTON J.A. BETWEEN: WAHTA MOHAWKS Appellant and KAREN COMMANDANT Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, May 29, 2008) LINDEN J.A. [1] In our view, the Applications Judge correctly decided that the appellant was in good standing financially in her relations with the Band and in the way he treated that issue referring it back to the Council with directions. [2] However, in sending the matter back with instructions to treat the appellant as a full-time student, he erred in that there was conflicting evidence on this issue, a factual matter which should be properly decided by the Council. [3] The matter concerning full-time studies, therefore, should be remitted to the Council to be determined within 30 days hereof and, to avoid any apprehension of bias, the Chief of the Band must not take part in this determination. [4] In the circumstances of divided success, no …

Read full judgment
Mohawks v. Commandant
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2008-05-29
Neutral citation
2008 FCA 195
File numbers
A-423-07
Decision Content
Date: 20080529
Docket: A-423-07
Citation: 2008 FCA 195
CORAM: LINDEN J.A.
NADON J.A.
SEXTON J.A.
BETWEEN:
WAHTA MOHAWKS
Appellant
and
KAREN COMMANDANT
Respondent
Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on May 29, 2008.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on May 29, 2008.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: LINDEN J.A.
Date: 20080529
Docket: A-423-07
Citation: 2008 FCA 195
CORAM: LINDEN J.A.
NADON J.A.
SEXTON J.A.
BETWEEN:
WAHTA MOHAWKS
Appellant
and
KAREN COMMANDANT
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, May 29, 2008)
LINDEN J.A.
[1] In our view, the Applications Judge correctly decided that the appellant was in good standing financially in her relations with the Band and in the way he treated that issue referring it back to the Council with directions.
[2] However, in sending the matter back with instructions to treat the appellant as a full-time student, he erred in that there was conflicting evidence on this issue, a factual matter which should be properly decided by the Council.
[3] The matter concerning full-time studies, therefore, should be remitted to the Council to be determined within 30 days hereof and, to avoid any apprehension of bias, the Chief of the Band must not take part in this determination.
[4] In the circumstances of divided success, no costs.
“A.M. Linden”
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-423-07
(AN APPEAL FROM THE ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE MR. MAX M. TEITELBAUM, DATED JULY 4, 2007, AS PER FEDERAL COURT FILE DOCKET NO. T-806-06.)
STYLE OF CAUSE: WAHTA MOHAWKS v. KAREN
COMMANDANT
PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO
DATE OF HEARING: MAY 29, 2008
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF
THE COURT BY: (LINDEN, NADON & SEXTON JJ.A.)
DELIVERED FROM THE
BENCH BY: LINDEN J.A.
DATED: MAY 29, 2008
APPEARANCES:
PATRICK SCHINDLER
FOR THE APPELLANT
MICHAEL SWARTZ
STEVE NICOLETTA
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
PATRICK SCHINDLER
Barrister & solicitor
TORONTO, ONTARIO
FOR THE APPELLANT
WEIR FOULDS LLP
BARRISTERS & SOLICITORS
TORONTO, ONTARIO
FOR THE RESPONDENT

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases