Ann Chu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
Source text
Ann Chu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2007-05-29 Neutral citation 2007 FCA 205 File numbers A-363-06 Notes Digest Decision Content Date: 20070529 Docket: A-363-06 Citation: 2007 FCA 205 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. LINDEN J.A. SEXTON J.A. BETWEEN: KIT MEI ANN CHU Appellant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia, on May 29, 2007. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia, on May 29, 2007. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: DÉCARY J.A. Date: 20070529 Docket: A-363-06 Citation: 2007 FCA 205 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. LINDEN J.A. SEXTON J.A. BETWEEN: KIT MEI ANN CHU Appellant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia, on May 29, 2007) DÉCARY J.A. [1] Despite Mr. Larson’s able argument, we have reached the view that there is nothing useful we could add to the reasons for judgment of Madam Justice Heneghan (2006 FC 893). [2] The appeal will be dismissed and the certified questions will be answered as follows: (i) The first certified question, “Does the five year period in section 28 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act apply to periods prior to June 28, 2002” is answered “Yes”. (ii) The second certified question, “If so, does applying section 28 retroactively breach section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms?” is answered …
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Ann Chu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2007-05-29 Neutral citation 2007 FCA 205 File numbers A-363-06 Notes Digest Decision Content Date: 20070529 Docket: A-363-06 Citation: 2007 FCA 205 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. LINDEN J.A. SEXTON J.A. BETWEEN: KIT MEI ANN CHU Appellant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia, on May 29, 2007. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia, on May 29, 2007. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: DÉCARY J.A. Date: 20070529 Docket: A-363-06 Citation: 2007 FCA 205 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. LINDEN J.A. SEXTON J.A. BETWEEN: KIT MEI ANN CHU Appellant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia, on May 29, 2007) DÉCARY J.A. [1] Despite Mr. Larson’s able argument, we have reached the view that there is nothing useful we could add to the reasons for judgment of Madam Justice Heneghan (2006 FC 893). [2] The appeal will be dismissed and the certified questions will be answered as follows: (i) The first certified question, “Does the five year period in section 28 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act apply to periods prior to June 28, 2002” is answered “Yes”. (ii) The second certified question, “If so, does applying section 28 retroactively breach section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms?” is answered “No”. "Robert Décary" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-363-06 STYLE OF CAUSE: KIT MEI ANN CHU v. MCI. PLACE OF HEARING: Vancouver, British Columbia DATE OF HEARING: May 29, 2007 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: DÉCARY J.A. LINDEN J.A. SEXTON J.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: DÉCARY J.A. DATED: May 29, 2007 APPEARANCES: Darryl W. Larson FOR THE APPELLANT Banafsheh Sokhansanj FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Embarkation Law Group Vancouver, B.C. FOR THE APPELLANT John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
Multani v Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys
[2006] 1 SCR 256