Ellis v. Horgan
Court headnote
Ellis v. Horgan Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2006-09-12 Neutral citation 2006 FC 1086 File numbers T-736-06 Decision Content Date: 20060912 Docket: T-736-06 Citation: 2006 FC 1086 Toronto, Ontario, September 12, 2006 PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROGER T. HUGHES BETWEEN: PATRICK ELLIS (SAULTEAUX TRIBE) Application (In the Private) and MICHAEL HORGAN CARRYING ON BUSINESS AS DEPUTY MINISTER OF INDIAN AND NORTHERN AFFAIRS CANADA Response (In the Private) REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER [1] To the extent that it is capable of being understood, this is an Application made pursuant to section 18.1 of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. F-7, for an Order requiring the Deputy Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs, to answer a series of questions, directed in part to Her Majesty relating to jurisdictional issues over Indian persons and lands. [2] Section 18.1 provides that this Court may provide relief in respect of a decision or order of a Federal board or tribunal where the applicant is a person affected. There is no decision or order in this case that could be the subject of proceedings under section 18.1. That section does not permit the questioning of a Minister or Deputy Minister in the absence of an underlying decision or order. [3] This application is so bereft of any substance that it must be dismissed (see David Bull Laboratories (Canada) Inc. v. Pharmacia Inc., [1995] 1 FC 588). ORDER THIS COURT ORDERS that: 1. The motion to dismiss the applicatio…
Read full judgment
Ellis v. Horgan Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2006-09-12 Neutral citation 2006 FC 1086 File numbers T-736-06 Decision Content Date: 20060912 Docket: T-736-06 Citation: 2006 FC 1086 Toronto, Ontario, September 12, 2006 PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROGER T. HUGHES BETWEEN: PATRICK ELLIS (SAULTEAUX TRIBE) Application (In the Private) and MICHAEL HORGAN CARRYING ON BUSINESS AS DEPUTY MINISTER OF INDIAN AND NORTHERN AFFAIRS CANADA Response (In the Private) REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER [1] To the extent that it is capable of being understood, this is an Application made pursuant to section 18.1 of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. F-7, for an Order requiring the Deputy Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs, to answer a series of questions, directed in part to Her Majesty relating to jurisdictional issues over Indian persons and lands. [2] Section 18.1 provides that this Court may provide relief in respect of a decision or order of a Federal board or tribunal where the applicant is a person affected. There is no decision or order in this case that could be the subject of proceedings under section 18.1. That section does not permit the questioning of a Minister or Deputy Minister in the absence of an underlying decision or order. [3] This application is so bereft of any substance that it must be dismissed (see David Bull Laboratories (Canada) Inc. v. Pharmacia Inc., [1995] 1 FC 588). ORDER THIS COURT ORDERS that: 1. The motion to dismiss the application is allowed; 2. The application is dismissed; 3. No order as to costs. “Roger T. Hughes” JUDGE FEDERAL COURT NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-736-06 STYLE OF CAUSE: PATRICK ELLIS (SAULTEAUX TRIBE); and MICHAEL HORGAN CARRYING ON BUSINESS AS DEPUTY MINISTER OF INDIAN AND NORTHERN AFFAIRS CANADA CONSIDERED AT TORONTO, ONTARIO PURSUANT TO RULE 369 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT: HUGHES J. DATED: September 12, 2006 WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY: Patrick Ellis FOR THE APPLICANT (self-represented) Anusha Aruliah FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Patrick Ellis P.O. Box 608 Arborg, Manitoba R0C 0A0 FOR THE APPLICANT (self-represented) John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca