Grieg Shipping A/S v. Dubai Fortune (Ship)
Source text
Grieg Shipping A/S v. Dubai Fortune (Ship) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2013-09-16 Neutral citation 2013 FCA 218 File numbers A-446-12 Decision Content Date: 20130916 Docket: A-446-12 Citation: 2013 FCA 218 CORAM: NADON J.A. PELLETIER J.A. GAUTHIER J.A. BETWEEN: GRIEG SHIPPING A/S Appellant and THE OWNERS AND ALL OTHERS INTERESTED IN THE SHIP "DUBAI FORTUNE" and FORTUNE MARITIME LTD. Respondents Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia, on September 16, 2013. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia, on September 16, 2013. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON J.A. Date: 20130916 Docket: A-446-12 Citation: 2013 FCA 218 CORAM: NADON J.A. PELLETIER J.A. GAUTHIER J.A. BETWEEN: GRIEG SHIPPING A/S Appellant and THE OWNERS AND ALL OTHERS INTERESTED IN THE SHIP "DUBAI FORTUNE" and FORTUNE MARITIME LTD. Respondents REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia, on September 16, 2013) NADON J.A. [1] We see no reviewable error on the part of the Judge in concluding that there was no vicarious liability on the part of the owners of the “Dubai Fortune” in respect of the collision between the tug “Tiger Shark” and the appellant’s ship the “Star Hansa”. [2] In our view, there was evidence to support the Judge’s finding that the collision resulted from an error in navigation by those in command of the “Tiger Shark”. [3] As we have not been persuaded that the Judge either erred in law or made …
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Grieg Shipping A/S v. Dubai Fortune (Ship) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2013-09-16 Neutral citation 2013 FCA 218 File numbers A-446-12 Decision Content Date: 20130916 Docket: A-446-12 Citation: 2013 FCA 218 CORAM: NADON J.A. PELLETIER J.A. GAUTHIER J.A. BETWEEN: GRIEG SHIPPING A/S Appellant and THE OWNERS AND ALL OTHERS INTERESTED IN THE SHIP "DUBAI FORTUNE" and FORTUNE MARITIME LTD. Respondents Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia, on September 16, 2013. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia, on September 16, 2013. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON J.A. Date: 20130916 Docket: A-446-12 Citation: 2013 FCA 218 CORAM: NADON J.A. PELLETIER J.A. GAUTHIER J.A. BETWEEN: GRIEG SHIPPING A/S Appellant and THE OWNERS AND ALL OTHERS INTERESTED IN THE SHIP "DUBAI FORTUNE" and FORTUNE MARITIME LTD. Respondents REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia, on September 16, 2013) NADON J.A. [1] We see no reviewable error on the part of the Judge in concluding that there was no vicarious liability on the part of the owners of the “Dubai Fortune” in respect of the collision between the tug “Tiger Shark” and the appellant’s ship the “Star Hansa”. [2] In our view, there was evidence to support the Judge’s finding that the collision resulted from an error in navigation by those in command of the “Tiger Shark”. [3] As we have not been persuaded that the Judge either erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error, the appeal will be dismissed with costs. "M. Nadon" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-446-12 (APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE FEDERAL COURT (THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LEMIEUX) DATED September 21, 2012, DOCKET NO. T-1174-07) STYLE OF CAUSE: Grieg Shipping A/S v. The Owners And All Others Interested In The Ship “Dubai Fortune” and Fortune Maritime Ltd. PLACE OF HEARING: Vancouver, British Columbia DATE OF HEARING: September 16, 2013 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: (NADON, PELLETIER, GAUTHIER JJ.A.) DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: NADON J.A. APPEARANCES: Gregory J. Tucker Zachary Ansley FOR THE APPELLANT W. Gary Wharton David Jarrett FOR THE RESPONDENTS SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Owen Bird Law Corporation Vancouver, British Columbia FOR THE APPELLANT Bernard & Partners Vancouver, British Columbia FOR THE RESPONDENTS
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
Démocratie en surveillance c. Canada (Procureur général)
2024 CAF 75