Halvorsen v. Canada (Attorney General)
Source text
Halvorsen v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2001-06-25 Neutral citation 2001 FCA 214 File numbers A-690-00 Decision Content Date: 20010625 Docket: A-690-00 Citation: 2001 FCA 214 Vancouver, British Columbia, Monday, the 25th day of June, 2001 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN, J.A. SEXTON, J.A. EVANS, J.A. BETWEEN: KAARE HALVORSEN Applicant - and - THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT (Delivered orally from the Bench on Monday, June 25, 2001) EVANS, J.A. [1] We are not satisfied that the Board based its decision on an erroneous finding of fact that it made in a perverse or capricious manner or without regard to the material before it, or that it committed any error of law in its formulation or application of the relevant statutory provision. [2] The application for judical review will be dismissed. In his memorandum counsel for the respondent explicitly did not seek costs, and none will be awarded. (Sgd.) "John Maxwell Evans" J.A. Vancouver, British Columbia June 25, 2001 …
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Halvorsen v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2001-06-25 Neutral citation 2001 FCA 214 File numbers A-690-00 Decision Content Date: 20010625 Docket: A-690-00 Citation: 2001 FCA 214 Vancouver, British Columbia, Monday, the 25th day of June, 2001 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN, J.A. SEXTON, J.A. EVANS, J.A. BETWEEN: KAARE HALVORSEN Applicant - and - THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT (Delivered orally from the Bench on Monday, June 25, 2001) EVANS, J.A. [1] We are not satisfied that the Board based its decision on an erroneous finding of fact that it made in a perverse or capricious manner or without regard to the material before it, or that it committed any error of law in its formulation or application of the relevant statutory provision. [2] The application for judical review will be dismissed. In his memorandum counsel for the respondent explicitly did not seek costs, and none will be awarded. (Sgd.) "John Maxwell Evans" J.A. Vancouver, British Columbia June 25, 2001
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
Administration des aéroports régionaux d’Edmonton c. Thibodeau
2024 CAF 196