Joly v. Gadwa

Joly v. Gadwa
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2017-10-04
Neutral citation
2017 FCA 203
File numbers
A-192-16
Decision Content
Date: 20171004
Docket: A-192-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 203
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
BOIVIN J.A.
RENNIE J.A.
BETWEEN:
BRENDA JOLY
Appellant
(Respondent by cross-appeal)
and
GORDON GADWA
Respondent
(Appellant by cross-appeal)
Heard at Edmonton, Alberta, on October 4, 2017.
Judgment delivered at Edmonton, Alberta, on October 4, 2017.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
RENNIE J.A.
CONCURRED IN BY:
WEBB J.A.
BOIVIN J.A.
Date: 20171004
Docket: A-192-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 203
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
BOIVIN J.A.
RENNIE J.A.
BETWEEN:
BRENDA JOLY
Appellant
(Respondent by cross-appeal)
and
GORDON GADWA
Respondent
(Appellant by cross-appeal)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
RENNIE J.A.
[1] This is an appeal and cross appeal from the decision of the Federal Court (per Justice Strickland), cited as 2016 FC 597. In that decision the Court upheld the decision of an Elections Officer appointed under the Kehewin Cree Nation’s custom Elections Act that the respondent, Gordon Gadwa engaged in a corrupt election practice which vitiated his election as Chief. However, the Federal Court set aside the Elections Officer’s decision to declare the second place candidate, Brenda Joly as Chief. The Court also set aside the decision of the Elections Officer to remove Mr. Gadwa as councillor.
[2] The appellant appeals the judge’s decision to order a new election for Chief of the Kehewin Cree Nation and to reinstate Mr. Gadwa as a Councillor. The respondent, Mr. Gadwa cross-appealed the judge’s decision that the Elections Officer’s finding that he engaged in a corrupt election practice was reasonable. The cross-appeal was abandoned at the outset of the hearing of the appeal. The cross-appeal should be dismissed.
[3] I would dismiss the appeal for the reasons given by the Federal Court judge. No error has been identified either in the judge’s assessment of the standard of review of the Elections Officer’s decision, nor in the application of that standard to the evidence before her.
[4] In the circumstances, I would not award costs.
"Donald J. Rennie"
J.A.
“I agree
Wyman W. Webb J.A.”
“I agree
Richard Boivin J.A.”
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF THE FEDERAL COURT DATED MAY 31, 2016, DOCKET NO. T-1875-15 (2016 FC 597)
DOCKET:
A-192-16
STYLE OF CAUSE:
BRENDA JOLY v. GORDON GADWA
PLACE OF HEARING:
Edmonton, Alberta
DATE OF HEARING:
OCTOBER 4, 2017
REASONS FOR judgment BY:
RENNIE J.A.
concurred in by:
WEBB J.A.
boivin j.a.
DATED:
october 4, 2017
APPEARANCES:
Priscilla Kennedy
For The Appellant
Angus Y.M. Cheung
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
DLA Piper (Canada) LLP
Edmonton, Alberta
For The APPELLANT
Wood Law Office
Edmonton, Alberta
FOR THE RESPONDENT