Skip to main content
Federal Court· 2002

Canada v. Côté

2002 FCT 601
GeneralJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Canada v. Côté Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2002-05-27 Neutral citation 2002 FCT 601 File numbers T-14-02 Decision Content Date: 20020527 Docket: T-14-02 Citation: 2002 FCT 601 BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY IN RIGHT OF CANADA Applicant - and- JOSEPH PIERRE LOUIS COTÉ Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS FRANÇOIS PILON Assessment Officer On March 20, 2002, the Court allowed the applicant's motion for default judgment, with costs. On April 2, 2002, Lyne Lasalle filed the applicant's bill of costs and asked that it be assessed without personal appearance of the parties. Given the absence of written representations by the respondent within the period specified by the Registry, we will assess the bill of costs of Her Majesty. [2] In regards to assessable services, Marieke Bouchard has claimed the following items: Item 1 5 Units Item 4 3 Units Item 25 1 Unit Item 26 4 Units Those claims seem reasonable to me in the circumstances and will be allowed. [3] The disbursements to be assessed were established by the affidavit in support of the bill of costs and are allowed in the amount of $188.52. The applicant's costs are assessed and allowed in the amount of $1,668.52$. A certificate for that amount will be issued by the assessment officer. Halifax, Nova Scotia François Pilon May 27, 2002 François Pilon Assessment Officer Certified True Translation S. Debbané, LLB FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA TRIAL DIVISION NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD COURT FILE NO.: T-14-02 BETW…

Read full judgment
Canada v. Côté
Court (s) Database
Federal Court Decisions
Date
2002-05-27
Neutral citation
2002 FCT 601
File numbers
T-14-02
Decision Content
Date: 20020527
Docket: T-14-02
Citation: 2002 FCT 601
BETWEEN:
HER MAJESTY IN RIGHT OF CANADA
Applicant
- and-
JOSEPH PIERRE LOUIS COTÉ
Respondent
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS
FRANÇOIS PILON
Assessment Officer
On March 20, 2002, the Court allowed the applicant's motion for default judgment, with costs. On April 2, 2002, Lyne Lasalle filed the applicant's bill of costs and asked that it be assessed without personal appearance of the parties. Given the absence of written representations by the respondent within the period specified by the Registry, we will assess the bill of costs of Her Majesty.
[2] In regards to assessable services, Marieke Bouchard has claimed the following items:
Item 1 5 Units
Item 4 3 Units
Item 25 1 Unit
Item 26 4 Units
Those claims seem reasonable to me in the circumstances and will be allowed.
[3] The disbursements to be assessed were established by the affidavit in support of the bill of costs and are allowed in the amount of $188.52. The applicant's costs are assessed and allowed in the amount of $1,668.52$. A certificate for that amount will be issued by the assessment officer.
Halifax, Nova Scotia
François Pilon
May 27, 2002
François Pilon
Assessment Officer
Certified True Translation
S. Debbané, LLB
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
TRIAL DIVISION
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
COURT FILE NO.: T-14-02
BETWEEN:
HER MAJESTY IN RIGHT OF CANADA
Applicant
- and-
JOSEPH PIERRE LOUIS COTÉ
Respondent
ASSESSMENT IN WRITING WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE
REASONS OF: François Pilon, Assessment Officer
PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Halifax, Nova Scotia
DATE OF REASONS: May 27, 2002
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Morris Rosenberg
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Ottawa, Ontario For the Applicant

Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca

Related cases