Stawicki v. Canada (National Revenue)

Stawicki v. Canada (National Revenue)
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2008-11-10
Neutral citation
2008 FCA 350
File numbers
A-195-06
Decision Content
Date: 20081110
Docket: A-195-06
Citation: 2008 FCA 350
CORAM: NOËL J.A.
NADON J.A.
PELLETIER J.A.
BETWEEN:
ANDRZEJ STANISLAW STAWICKI
Appellant
and
MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE
Respondent
and
JUDITH ELIZABETH WILSON
Intervener
Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia, on November 5, 2008.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 10, 2008.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: NADON J.A.
CONCURRED IN BY: NOËL J.A.
PELLETIER J.A.
Date: 20081110
Docket: A-195-06
Citation: 2008 FCA 350
CORAM: NOËL J.A.
NADON J.A.
PELLETIER J.A.
BETWEEN:
ANDRZEJ STANISLAW STAWICKI
Appellant
and
MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE
Respondent
and
JUDITH ELIZABETH WILSON
Intervener
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
NADON J.A.
[1] This is an appeal from a decision of Mr. Justice Beaubier of the Tax Court of Canada dated March 31, 2006 (2006 TCC 207), which dismissed the appellant’s appeal from a determination by the Minister of National Revenue that the appellant had employed the intervenor, Judith Wilson, in insurable employment from January 1, 2002 to November 10, 2002.
[2] After reviewing the evidence in the light of this Court’s decision in Wiebe Door Services Ltd v. MNR, [1986] 3 FC 553, the Judge concluded that Ms. Wilson was an employee of the appellant during the period at issue.
[3] Notwithstanding Mr. Stawicki’s submissions to the contrary, we have not been persuaded that there is any basis for us to intervene. In our view, the Judge made no error of law nor did he make findings of fact or draw inferences from these facts which cannot be supported by the record before him.
[4] We are also satisfied that neither the conduct of the hearing by the Judge nor his treatment of the evidence give rise to a breach of either natural justice or procedural fairness. More particularly, we are of the view that the Trial Judge’s impartiality was not affected by the presence of RCMP officers in the courtroom nor by their meeting with the Judge during the lunch break on March 17, 2006.
[5] For these reasons, I would dismiss the appeal with costs in favour of the respondent. I would award no costs to the intervener.
“M. Nadon”
J.A.
“I agree.
Marc Noël J.A.”
“I agree.
J.D. Denis Pelletier J.A.”
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-195-06
STYLE OF CAUSE: ANDRZEJ STANISLAW STAWICKI V. MNR
PLACE OF HEARING: Vancouver, British Columbia
DATE OF HEARING: November 5, 2008
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: NADON J.A.
CONCURRED IN BY: NOËL J.A.
PELLETIER J.A.
DATED: November 10, 2008
APPEARANCES:
Andrzej Stawicki
THE APPELLANT ON HIS BEHALF
John Gibb-Carsley
Linda Bell
FOR THE RESPONDENT
Judith Wilson
THE INTERVENER
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
John H. Sims, Q.C.
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
FOR THE RESPONDENT