Dunn v. Prescott Elevator Co.
Court headnote
Dunn v. Prescott Elevator Co. Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1900-10-08 Report (1900) 30 SCR 620 Judges Henry, William Alexander; Strong, Samuel Henry; Taschereau, Henri-Elzéar; Gwynne, John Wellington; Sedgewick, Robert; Girouard, Désiré On appeal from Ontario Subjects Transportation Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Dunn v. Prescott Elevator Co., (1900) 30 S.C.R. 620 Date: 1900-10-08 Dunn and Prescott Elevator Co. 1900: May 29, 30; 1900: October 8. Present: Sir Henry Strong C.J. and Taschereau, Gwynne, Sedgewick and Girouard JJ. Warehouseman—Negligence—Damages—New trial. APPEAL from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario[1], ordering a new trial. After hearing counsel for the parties the court reserved judgment and on a subsequent day, dismissed the appeal, for the reasons given in the judgment from. The Chief Justice was prevented by illness from taking part in the judgment. Appeal dismissed with costs. Leitch Q.C. for the appellant. Shepley Q.C. and French Q.C. for the respondent. [1] 26 Ont. App. R. 389. …
Read full judgment
Dunn v. Prescott Elevator Co. Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1900-10-08 Report (1900) 30 SCR 620 Judges Henry, William Alexander; Strong, Samuel Henry; Taschereau, Henri-Elzéar; Gwynne, John Wellington; Sedgewick, Robert; Girouard, Désiré On appeal from Ontario Subjects Transportation Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Dunn v. Prescott Elevator Co., (1900) 30 S.C.R. 620 Date: 1900-10-08 Dunn and Prescott Elevator Co. 1900: May 29, 30; 1900: October 8. Present: Sir Henry Strong C.J. and Taschereau, Gwynne, Sedgewick and Girouard JJ. Warehouseman—Negligence—Damages—New trial. APPEAL from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario[1], ordering a new trial. After hearing counsel for the parties the court reserved judgment and on a subsequent day, dismissed the appeal, for the reasons given in the judgment from. The Chief Justice was prevented by illness from taking part in the judgment. Appeal dismissed with costs. Leitch Q.C. for the appellant. Shepley Q.C. and French Q.C. for the respondent. [1] 26 Ont. App. R. 389.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca