Shepel v. Paterson GlobalFoods Incorporated

Shepel v. Paterson GlobalFoods Incorporated
Collection
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Date
2008-12-16
Neutral citation
2008 CHRT 50
File number(s)
T1305/3508
Decision-maker(s)
Sinclair, Grant, Q.C.
Decision type
Decision
Decision Content
CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL TRIBUNAL CANADIEN DES DROITS DE LA PERSONNE
MARY SHEPEL
Complainant
- and -
CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
Commission
- and -
PATERSON GLOBALFOODS INCORPORATED
Respondent
DECISION
2008 CHRT 50 2008/12/16
MEMBER: J. Grant Sinclair
[1] The hearing in this complaint was convened at 9:30 a.m. on Monday, November 24, 2008 at Winnipeg, Manitoba. At the commencement of the hearing, the Tribunal Registry Officer read the case for hearing and called for appearances. Ms. Suzanne Dandenault, counsel for the Respondent Paterson GlobalFoods Incorporated was in attendance.
[2] The Complainant, Mary C. Shepel, did not appear and was not in attendance at the opening of the hearing, nor did anyone appear on her behalf.
[3] No one appeared at the hearing on behalf of the Canadian Human Rights Commission.
[4] The Tribunal adjourned the hearing until 9:50 a.m. that same day. Upon resumption, the Registry Officer once again called for appearances. Counsel for the Respondent was again in attendance but neither Ms. Shepel nor anyone on her behalf was present.
[5] On August 19, 2008, the Complainant requested the hearing of her complaint be held during the last week of October or mid to end of November 2008. In response to a further request from the Complainant for the hearing to be fixed, Ms. Shepel was advised by the Tribunal on September 11, 2008 that the hearing would proceed at Winnipeg from November 24 to 28, 2008.
[6] In accordance with the Tribunal's instructions of September 26, 2008, the time for the Complainant to provide full disclosure pursuant to Tribunal Rule 6 was extended to October 3, 2008. The Complainant later advised the Tribunal on October 9, 2008 that her disclosure would be filed on October 14, 2008.
[7] The Complainant failed to meet her disclosure deadline as per Rule 6(1) of the Tribunal's Rules and Procedures. Nor has the Complainant requested a further extension or a conference call with the Tribunal to discuss the outstanding issue of disclosure.
[8] A Notice confirming the November hearing dates was sent to Ms. Shepel on October 10, 2008. On November 6, 2008, Ms. Shepel wrote to the Tribunal that she no longer had the resources or time to go forward with the preparation needed for the Tribunal process.
[9] On November 13, 2008, the Tribunal notified Ms. Shepel again of the location, dates and time for the hearing of her complaint. Ms. Shepel responded on November 20, 2008 that she would not be participating in the hearing at this time. She did not request that the hearing be rescheduled.
[10] No evidence was called or otherwise provided in support of Mary Shepel's complaint at the hearing on November 24, 2008. Accordingly, I find that the complaint against Paterson GlobalFoods Incorporated has not been substantiated and is hereby dismissed under section 53(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act.
Signed by
J. Grant Sinclair
OTTAWA, Ontario December 16, 2008
PARTIES OF RECORD
TRIBUNAL FILE:
T1305/3508
STYLE OF CAUSE:
Mary Shepel v. Paterson GlobalFoods Incorporated
DATE AND PLACE OF HEARING:
November 24, 2008
Winnipeg, Manitoba
DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED:
December 16, 2008
APPEARANCES:
No one appearing
For the Complainant
No one appearing
For the Canadian Human Rights Commission
Suzanne Dandenault
For the Respondent