Hydro-Québec v. Churchill Falls (Labrador) Corp.
Court headnote
Hydro-Québec v. Churchill Falls (Labrador) Corp. Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1988-06-09 Report [1988] 1 SCR 1087 Case number 19339 Judges Dickson, Robert George Brian; Beetz, Jean; McIntyre, William Rogers; Lamer, Antonio; Wilson, Bertha; Le Dain, Gerald Eric; La Forest, Gérard V. On appeal from Quebec Subjects Appeal Notes SCC Case Information: 19339 Decision Content hydro‑québec v. churchill falls (labrador) corp., [1988] 1 S.C.R. 1087 Churchill Falls (Labrador) Corporation Limited Appellant v. Hydro‑Québec Respondent and Royal Trust Company Mis en cause and General Trust of Canada Mis en cause indexed as: hydro‑québec v. churchill falls (labrador) corp. File No.: 19339. 1988: May 4; 1988: June 9. Present: Dickson C.J. and Beetz, McIntyre, Lamer, Wilson, Le Dain and La Forest JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for quebec Appeal ‑‑ Interpretation of contract for the provision of hydro-electric energy ‑‑ Appeal moot in view of this Court's judgment: Newfoundland (Attorney General) v. Churchill Falls (Labrador) Corp. Held: The appeal should be dismissed. Case Cited Referred to: Newfoundland (Attorney General) v. Churchill Falls (Labrador) Corp., [1988] 1 S.C.R. 1085. APPEAL from a judgment of the Quebec Court of Appeal, J.E. 85-255, affirming a judgment of the Superior Court, [1983] C.S. 604. Appeal dismissed. 1. Colin K. Irving and Franklin S. Gertler, for the appellant. 2. Michel Jetté, André E. Gadbois, Q.C., and Julie Veilleux, for the respondent. 3. J. Vin…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.scc-csc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Hydro-Québec v. Churchill Falls (Labrador) Corp. Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1988-06-09 Report [1988] 1 SCR 1087 Case number 19339 Judges Dickson, Robert George Brian; Beetz, Jean; McIntyre, William Rogers; Lamer, Antonio; Wilson, Bertha; Le Dain, Gerald Eric; La Forest, Gérard V. On appeal from Quebec Subjects Appeal Notes SCC Case Information: 19339 Decision Content hydro‑québec v. churchill falls (labrador) corp., [1988] 1 S.C.R. 1087 Churchill Falls (Labrador) Corporation Limited Appellant v. Hydro‑Québec Respondent and Royal Trust Company Mis en cause and General Trust of Canada Mis en cause indexed as: hydro‑québec v. churchill falls (labrador) corp. File No.: 19339. 1988: May 4; 1988: June 9. Present: Dickson C.J. and Beetz, McIntyre, Lamer, Wilson, Le Dain and La Forest JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for quebec Appeal ‑‑ Interpretation of contract for the provision of hydro-electric energy ‑‑ Appeal moot in view of this Court's judgment: Newfoundland (Attorney General) v. Churchill Falls (Labrador) Corp. Held: The appeal should be dismissed. Case Cited Referred to: Newfoundland (Attorney General) v. Churchill Falls (Labrador) Corp., [1988] 1 S.C.R. 1085. APPEAL from a judgment of the Quebec Court of Appeal, J.E. 85-255, affirming a judgment of the Superior Court, [1983] C.S. 604. Appeal dismissed. 1. Colin K. Irving and Franklin S. Gertler, for the appellant. 2. Michel Jetté, André E. Gadbois, Q.C., and Julie Veilleux, for the respondent. 3. J. Vincent O'Donnell, Q.C., for the mis en cause the Royal Trust Co. English version of the judgment delivered by 4. The Court ‑‑ In view of the judgment handed down today in Newfoundland (Attorney General) v. Churchill Falls (Labrador) Corp., [1988] 1 S.C.R. 1085, this appeal is moot. 5. The appeal is dismissed without costs. Appeal dismissed. Solicitors for the appellant: McMaster Meighen, Montréal. Solicitors for the respondent: Geoffrion, Jetté, Montréal. Solicitors for the mis en cause the Royal Trust Co.: Lavery, O'Brien, Montréal.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca
Hadley v Baxendale
(1854) 9 Exch 341