Skip to main content
Supreme Court of Canada· 1917

St. Lawrence Flour Mills Co. v Stewart

(1917) 55 SCR 624
TortJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

St. Lawrence Flour Mills Co. v Stewart Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1917-11-28 Report (1917) 55 SCR 624 Judges Fitzpatrick, Charles; Davies, Louis Henry; Idington, John; Duff, Lyman Poore; Anglin, Francis Alexander On appeal from Quebec Subjects Labour law Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada St. Lawrence Flour Mills Co. v Stewart, (1917) 55 S.C.R. 624 Date: 1917-11-28 St. Lawrence Flour Mills Company v. Stewart. 1917: October 26; 1917: November 28. Present: Sir Charles Fitzpatrick C.J. and Davies, Idington, Duff and Anglin JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF KING'S BENCH, APPEAL SIDE, PROVINCE OF QUEBEC. Master and servant—Liability—Saw-guard—Contributory negligence. APPEAL from the judgment of the Court of King's Bench, Appeal Side[1], reversing the judgment of Greenshields J. at the trial and maintaining the action of the plaintiff-respondent with costs. The respondent, a millwright, was employed as such by the appellant in a large flour mill. While he was operating a circular saw, his left hand was suddenly turned into the teeth of the saw. The respondent took an action in damages for $10,000.00, alleging that the accident occurred because there was no guard over the saw, when the appellant should have had one installed. The appellant denied any liability for the reasons that the respondent had, for a long time before the accident, control of the saw, that he was himself aware of the necessity of a guard and that he had never complained or asked that one should…

Read full judgment
St. Lawrence Flour Mills Co. v Stewart
Collection
Supreme Court Judgments
Date
1917-11-28
Report
(1917) 55 SCR 624
Judges
Fitzpatrick, Charles; Davies, Louis Henry; Idington, John; Duff, Lyman Poore; Anglin, Francis Alexander
On appeal from
Quebec
Subjects
Labour law
Decision Content
Supreme Court of Canada
St. Lawrence Flour Mills Co. v Stewart, (1917) 55 S.C.R. 624
Date: 1917-11-28
St. Lawrence Flour Mills Company v. Stewart.
1917: October 26; 1917: November 28.
Present: Sir Charles Fitzpatrick C.J. and Davies, Idington, Duff and Anglin JJ.
ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF KING'S BENCH, APPEAL SIDE, PROVINCE OF QUEBEC.
Master and servant—Liability—Saw-guard—Contributory negligence.
APPEAL from the judgment of the Court of King's Bench, Appeal Side[1], reversing the judgment of Greenshields J. at the trial and maintaining the action of the plaintiff-respondent with costs.
The respondent, a millwright, was employed as such by the appellant in a large flour mill. While he was operating a circular saw, his left hand was suddenly turned into the teeth of the saw. The respondent took an action in damages for $10,000.00, alleging that the accident occurred because there was no guard over the saw, when the appellant should have had one installed. The appellant denied any liability for the reasons that the respondent had, for a long time before the accident, control of the saw, that he was himself aware of the necessity of a guard and that he had never complained or asked that one should be installed.
The trial court dismissed the action on the ground that the respondent was alone responsible for the accident. But this judgment was reversed by the Court of Appeal who held that the appellant was also, though in a less degree, liable and, on account of contributory negligence, assessed damages at $2,000.00. The defendant appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada, which, after having heard counsel on behalf of both parties, reserved judgment and subsequently dismissed the appeal, Davies J. dissenting.
Appeal dismissed with costs.
J. E. Martin K.C. and John Hackett for the appellant.
Vipond K.C. for the respondent.
[1] Q.R. 26 K.B. 476.

Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca

Related cases