Skip to main content
Supreme Court of Canada· 1920

Cushman Motor Works of Canada v. Laing

(1920) 60 SCR 649
ContractJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Cushman Motor Works of Canada v. Laing Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1920-03-08 Report (1920) 60 SCR 649 Judges Davies, Louis Henry; Idington, John; Duff, Lyman Poore; Brodeur, Louis-Philippe; Mignault, Pierre-Basile On appeal from Alberta Subjects Sale Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Cushman Motor Works of Canada v. Laing, (1920) 60 S.C.R. 649 Date: 1920-03-08 Cushman Motor Works of Canada; v. Laing 1920: February 10; 1920: March 8. Present:—Sir Louis Davies C.J. and Idington, Duff, Brodeur and Mignault JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF ALBERTA. Sale—Farm machinery—Conditions—Misrepresentation—Use of machine—Right to rescission. APPEAL from the judgment of the Supreme Court of Alberta, Appellate Division[1], affirming the judgment of Stuart J. at the trial [2] and dismissing the appellant's, plaintiff's, action. The action is for the recovery of a lien note given by the respondent as part of the purchase price of a combination threshing outfit. The respondent pleaded that the machine did not fulfil the conditions and the warranties contracted for. The trial judge and the Appellate Division found as a fact that the respondent never got the article he bargained for and also found, in the circumstances of this case, a sufficient explanation of the retention by the respondent of the machine for a long period. On the appeal by the plaintiff to the Supreme Court of Canada, the court, after hearing counsel for both parties, reserve…

Read full judgment
Cushman Motor Works of Canada v. Laing
Collection
Supreme Court Judgments
Date
1920-03-08
Report
(1920) 60 SCR 649
Judges
Davies, Louis Henry; Idington, John; Duff, Lyman Poore; Brodeur, Louis-Philippe; Mignault, Pierre-Basile
On appeal from
Alberta
Subjects
Sale
Decision Content
Supreme Court of Canada
Cushman Motor Works of Canada v. Laing, (1920) 60 S.C.R. 649
Date: 1920-03-08
Cushman Motor Works of Canada;
v.
Laing
1920: February 10; 1920: March 8.
Present:—Sir Louis Davies C.J. and Idington, Duff, Brodeur and Mignault JJ.
ON APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF ALBERTA.
Sale—Farm machinery—Conditions—Misrepresentation—Use of machine—Right to rescission. APPEAL from the judgment of the Supreme Court of Alberta, Appellate Division[1], affirming the judgment of Stuart J. at the trial [2] and dismissing the appellant's, plaintiff's, action. The action is for the recovery of a lien note given by the respondent as part of the purchase price of a combination threshing outfit. The respondent pleaded that the machine did not fulfil the conditions and the warranties contracted for.
The trial judge and the Appellate Division found as a fact that the respondent never got the article he bargained for and also found, in the circumstances of this case, a sufficient explanation of the retention by the respondent of the machine for a long period.
On the appeal by the plaintiff to the Supreme Court of Canada, the court, after hearing counsel for both parties, reserved judgment, and, at a subsequent date, dismissed the appeal with costs.
Appeal dismissed with costs.
A. H. Clarke K.C. for the appellant.
J. W. McDonald K.C. for the respondent.
[1] 15 Alta. L.R. 53; [1919] 3 W.W.R. 494; 49 D.L.R. 1.
[2] [1919] 2 W.W.R. 311.

Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca

Related cases