Canadian National Rys. v. Pomerleau
Court headnote
Canadian National Rys. v. Pomerleau Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1930-04-10 Report [1931] SCR 287 Judges Duff, Lyman Poore; Rinfret, Thibaudeau; Lamont, John Henderson; Smith, Robert; Cannon, Lawrence Arthur Dumoulin On appeal from Quebec Subjects Torts Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Canadian National Rys. v. Pomerleau, [1931] S.C.R. 287 Date: 1930-04-10. Canadian National Railways v. Pomerleau 1930: February 19; 1930: April 10. Present: Duff, Rinfret, Lamont, Smith and Cannon JJ ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF KING’S BENCH, APPEAL SIDE, PROVINCE OF QUEBEC Negligence—Railway—Level crossing—Speed—Thickly peopled place—Railway Act, R.S.C. 1927, c. 170, s. 309 APPEAL from the decision of the Court of King’s Bench, appeal side, province of Quebec[1], affirming the judgment of the Superior Court, Demers J., and maintaining the respondent’s action in damages. Action was brought by the respondent both personally and in her quality of tutrix to her five minor children, for the sum of $25,000, damages resulting from the death of her husband, Alfred Nadeau, as a result of a collision between an electric car belonging to the appellant and an automobile belonging to and driven by one Cournoyer, the respondent’s husband at the time a passenger in the automobile. The Superior Court gave judgment for $12,000 and this judgment was maintained in the Court of King’s Bench, Mr. Justice Hall and Mr. Justice Rivard dissenting. The sole question in the appeal before this court was…
Read full judgment
Canadian National Rys. v. Pomerleau Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1930-04-10 Report [1931] SCR 287 Judges Duff, Lyman Poore; Rinfret, Thibaudeau; Lamont, John Henderson; Smith, Robert; Cannon, Lawrence Arthur Dumoulin On appeal from Quebec Subjects Torts Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Canadian National Rys. v. Pomerleau, [1931] S.C.R. 287 Date: 1930-04-10. Canadian National Railways v. Pomerleau 1930: February 19; 1930: April 10. Present: Duff, Rinfret, Lamont, Smith and Cannon JJ ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF KING’S BENCH, APPEAL SIDE, PROVINCE OF QUEBEC Negligence—Railway—Level crossing—Speed—Thickly peopled place—Railway Act, R.S.C. 1927, c. 170, s. 309 APPEAL from the decision of the Court of King’s Bench, appeal side, province of Quebec[1], affirming the judgment of the Superior Court, Demers J., and maintaining the respondent’s action in damages. Action was brought by the respondent both personally and in her quality of tutrix to her five minor children, for the sum of $25,000, damages resulting from the death of her husband, Alfred Nadeau, as a result of a collision between an electric car belonging to the appellant and an automobile belonging to and driven by one Cournoyer, the respondent’s husband at the time a passenger in the automobile. The Superior Court gave judgment for $12,000 and this judgment was maintained in the Court of King’s Bench, Mr. Justice Hall and Mr. Justice Rivard dissenting. The sole question in the appeal before this court was whether the trial judge was bound to find on the evidence adduced that the sole direct cause of the tragedy was the negligence of Cournoyer, or whether the appellant company, knowing the crossing to be a dangerous one, failed to take reasonable precautions to avoid any accident. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the appeal with costs, thus affirming the judgments awarding $12,000 damages to the respondent. Appeal dismissed with costs. Arthur Vallée K.C. for the appellant. J. P. Lanctôt for the respondent. [1] (1930) Q.R. 48 K.B. 97.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca