Skip to main content
Supreme Court of Canada· 1929

Chertkow v. Feinstein

[1930] SCR 335
ContractJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Chertkow v. Feinstein Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1929-10-03 Report [1930] SCR 335 Judges Duff, Lyman Poore; Newcombe, Edmund Leslie; Rinfret, Thibaudeau; Lamont, John Henderson; Smith, Robert On appeal from Alberta Subjects Family law Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Chertkow v. Feinstein, [1930] S.C.R. 335 Date: 1929-10-03 Chertkow; v. Feinstein 1929: October 3. Present:—Duff, Newcombe, Rinfret, Lamont and Smith JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF ALBERTA Marriage—Annulment—Capacity to contract—Alleged unsound mind at date of marriage—Evidence—Sufficiency APPEAL by the plaintiff from the decision of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Alberta[1], reversing the judgment of the trial judge, Ives J.[2], and dismissing the appellant's action in annulment of marriage. The issue to be determined in the case was whether the respondent at the time of the marriage was of sound mind so as to be able to enter into the contract of matrimony. At the conclusion of the argument of counsel for the appellant, and without calling on counsel for the respondent, the court orally delivered judgment dismissing the appeal with costs. Appeal dismissed with costs. [1] (1929) 24 Alta. L.R. 188; [1929] 2 W.W.R. 257. [2] [1929] 1 W.W.R. 467. …

Read full judgment
Chertkow v. Feinstein
Collection
Supreme Court Judgments
Date
1929-10-03
Report
[1930] SCR 335
Judges
Duff, Lyman Poore; Newcombe, Edmund Leslie; Rinfret, Thibaudeau; Lamont, John Henderson; Smith, Robert
On appeal from
Alberta
Subjects
Family law
Decision Content
Supreme Court of Canada
Chertkow v. Feinstein, [1930] S.C.R. 335
Date: 1929-10-03
Chertkow;
v.
Feinstein
1929: October 3.
Present:—Duff, Newcombe, Rinfret, Lamont and Smith JJ.
ON APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF ALBERTA
Marriage—Annulment—Capacity to contract—Alleged unsound mind at date of marriage—Evidence—Sufficiency APPEAL by the plaintiff from the decision of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Alberta[1], reversing the judgment of the trial judge, Ives J.[2], and dismissing the appellant's action in annulment of marriage. The issue to be determined in the case was whether the respondent at the time of the marriage was of sound mind so as to be able to enter into the contract of matrimony.
At the conclusion of the argument of counsel for the appellant, and without calling on counsel for the respondent, the court orally delivered judgment dismissing the appeal with costs.
Appeal dismissed with costs.
[1] (1929) 24 Alta. L.R. 188; [1929] 2 W.W.R. 257.
[2] [1929] 1 W.W.R. 467.

Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca

Related cases