Merck & Co. Inc. v. Brantford Chemicals Inc.
Court headnote
Merck & Co. Inc. v. Brantford Chemicals Inc. Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2004-09-13 Neutral citation 2004 FCA 293 File numbers A-180-04 Decision Content Date: 20040913 Docket: A-180-04 Citation: 2004 FCA 293 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. SHARLOW J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: MERCK & CO. INC. and MERCK FROSST CANADA & CO. Appellants (Plaintiffs) and BRANTFORD CHEMICALS INC. Respondent (Defendant) Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on September 13th, 2004. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on September 13th, 2004. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A. Date: 20040913 Docket: A-180-04 Citation: 2004 FCA 293 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. SHARLOW J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: MERCK & CO. INC. and MERCK FROSST CANADA & CO. Appellants (Plaintiffs) and BRANTFORD CHEMICALS INC. Respondent (Defendant) REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on September 13th, 2004) ROTHSTEIN J.A. [1] We have not been persuaded that the discretionary order of Prothonotary Milczynski as confirmed by Campbell J. should be interfered with by this Court. The need for particulars is not apparent on the face of the record and the appellants did not provide any affidavit evidence explaining the need for particulars. [2] The appeal will be dismissed with costs. "Marshall Rothstein" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-180-04 STYLE OF CAUSE: MERCK & CO. INC. and MERCK FROSST CANADA & CO. Appellan…
Read full judgment
Merck & Co. Inc. v. Brantford Chemicals Inc. Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2004-09-13 Neutral citation 2004 FCA 293 File numbers A-180-04 Decision Content Date: 20040913 Docket: A-180-04 Citation: 2004 FCA 293 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. SHARLOW J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: MERCK & CO. INC. and MERCK FROSST CANADA & CO. Appellants (Plaintiffs) and BRANTFORD CHEMICALS INC. Respondent (Defendant) Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on September 13th, 2004. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on September 13th, 2004. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A. Date: 20040913 Docket: A-180-04 Citation: 2004 FCA 293 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. SHARLOW J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: MERCK & CO. INC. and MERCK FROSST CANADA & CO. Appellants (Plaintiffs) and BRANTFORD CHEMICALS INC. Respondent (Defendant) REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on September 13th, 2004) ROTHSTEIN J.A. [1] We have not been persuaded that the discretionary order of Prothonotary Milczynski as confirmed by Campbell J. should be interfered with by this Court. The need for particulars is not apparent on the face of the record and the appellants did not provide any affidavit evidence explaining the need for particulars. [2] The appeal will be dismissed with costs. "Marshall Rothstein" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-180-04 STYLE OF CAUSE: MERCK & CO. INC. and MERCK FROSST CANADA & CO. Appellants (Plaintiffs) and BRANTFORD CHEMICALS INC. Respondent (Defendant) PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO DATE OF HEARING: SEPTEMBER 13, 2004 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY : (ROTHSTEIN J.A., SHARLOW J.A., MALONE J.A.) DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A. APPEARANCES: Mr. Peter Wilcox Mrs. Allyson Whyte-Nowak FOR THE APPELLANTS Mr. Richard Nailberg FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Ogilvy Renault Toronto, Ontario FOR THE APPELLANTS Goodmans LLP Toronto, Ontario FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca