Liew v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)
Source text
Liew v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2009-02-26 Neutral citation 2009 FC 205 File numbers IMM-5242-08 Decision Content Date: 20090226 Docket: IMM-5242-08 Citation: 2009 FC 205 Ottawa, Ontario, February 26, 2009 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Phelan BETWEEN: TEE MENG LIEW Applicant and THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER [1] This motion seeks relief in the nature of declaration and injunction to obtain a finding that a diplomatic note issued by Malaysia does not contain sufficient assurances against the possibility that Mr. Liew would be tortured and/or executed if found guilty in Malaysia. [2] The motion arises against the background of a PRRA which is before the Minister and of a Leave for Judicial Review seeking to mandamus ordering the granting of a favourable PRRA decision. [3] The Court has dismissed the Leave for Judicial Review. The Court notes that the submissions made show good reason for a contempt show cause against the Applicant and counsel regarding the comments directed at Justice Zinn and his decision. This Order is notice to the Applicant and counsel that further comments of a like nature directed against this Court or a judge of this Court could lead to show cause proceedings. [4] As to the current motion, it is premature. The issue of the Malaysian government’s assurance are before the PRRA officer. The officer is required to …
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Liew v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2009-02-26 Neutral citation 2009 FC 205 File numbers IMM-5242-08 Decision Content Date: 20090226 Docket: IMM-5242-08 Citation: 2009 FC 205 Ottawa, Ontario, February 26, 2009 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Phelan BETWEEN: TEE MENG LIEW Applicant and THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER [1] This motion seeks relief in the nature of declaration and injunction to obtain a finding that a diplomatic note issued by Malaysia does not contain sufficient assurances against the possibility that Mr. Liew would be tortured and/or executed if found guilty in Malaysia. [2] The motion arises against the background of a PRRA which is before the Minister and of a Leave for Judicial Review seeking to mandamus ordering the granting of a favourable PRRA decision. [3] The Court has dismissed the Leave for Judicial Review. The Court notes that the submissions made show good reason for a contempt show cause against the Applicant and counsel regarding the comments directed at Justice Zinn and his decision. This Order is notice to the Applicant and counsel that further comments of a like nature directed against this Court or a judge of this Court could lead to show cause proceedings. [4] As to the current motion, it is premature. The issue of the Malaysian government’s assurance are before the PRRA officer. The officer is required to issue a decision in a reasonable time. It is only upon receipt of the decision that one would know if the Applicant’s speculation is a reality. [5] Therefore, this motion is dismissed. As this motion is within the context of an immigration proceeding, no costs will be awarded. ORDER THIS COURT ORDERS that the motion is dismissed. No costs are awarded. “Michael L. Phelan” Judge FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-5242-08 STYLE OF CAUSE: TEE MENG LIEW and THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS MOTION IN WRITING CONSIDERED AT OTTAWA, ONTARIO, PURSUANT TO RULE 369 REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER: Phelan J. DATED: February 26, 2009 WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY: Mr. Timothy E. Leahy FOR THE APPLICANT Ms. Deborah Drukarsh FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: FOREFRONT MIGRATION LTD. Toronto, Ontario FOR THE APPLICANT MR. JOHN H. SIMS, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada Toronto, Ontario FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca
Childs v Desormeaux
[2006] 1 SCR 643