Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2003

Andrews v. Canada (Attorney General)

2003 FCA 253
EvidenceJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Andrews v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2003-06-04 Neutral citation 2003 FCA 253 File numbers A-576-02 Decision Content Date: 20030604 Docket: A-576-02 Citation: 2003 FCA 253 CORAM: LINDEN J.A. ROTHSTEIN J.A. SEXTON J.A. BETWEEN: PAUL ANDREWS Applicant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia, on June 4, 2003. Judgment delivered at Vancouver, British Columbia, on June 4, 2003. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: LINDEN J.A. Date: 20030604 Docket: A-576-02 Citation: 2003 FCA 253 CORAM: LINDEN J.A. ROTHSTEIN J.A. SEXTON J.A. BETWEEN: PAUL ANDREWS Applicant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT LINDEN J.A. [1] Regretfully, this application must be dismissed. However, we are advised by counsel for the Crown that Section 84(2) of the Canada Pension Plan permits in this case a totally fresh determination by the Review Tribunal based on all of the evidence that has been developed on behalf of Mr. Andrews. We expect that Mr. Andrews will undertake this course and wish him well. (Sgd.) "Allen M. Linden" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-576-02 STYLE OF CAUSE: Paul Andrews v. The Attorney General of Canada PLACE OF HEARING: Vancouver DATE OF HEARING: June 4, 2003 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT : LINDEN, ROTHSTEIN, SEXTON, JJ.A. DATED: June 4, 2003 APPEARANCES: Mr. Paul Andrews APPLICANT on his own behalf Mr. Michel Mathieu FOR THE RESPO…

Read full judgment
Andrews v. Canada (Attorney General)
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2003-06-04
Neutral citation
2003 FCA 253
File numbers
A-576-02
Decision Content
Date: 20030604
Docket: A-576-02
Citation: 2003 FCA 253
CORAM: LINDEN J.A.
ROTHSTEIN J.A.
SEXTON J.A.
BETWEEN:
PAUL ANDREWS
Applicant
and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF CANADA
Respondent
Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia, on June 4, 2003.
Judgment delivered at Vancouver, British Columbia, on June 4, 2003.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: LINDEN J.A.
Date: 20030604
Docket: A-576-02
Citation: 2003 FCA 253
CORAM: LINDEN J.A.
ROTHSTEIN J.A.
SEXTON J.A.
BETWEEN:
PAUL ANDREWS
Applicant
and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF CANADA
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
LINDEN J.A.
[1] Regretfully, this application must be dismissed. However, we are advised by counsel for the Crown that Section 84(2) of the Canada Pension Plan permits in this case a totally fresh determination by the Review Tribunal based on all of the evidence that has been developed on behalf of Mr. Andrews. We expect that Mr. Andrews will undertake this course and wish him well.
(Sgd.) "Allen M. Linden"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-576-02
STYLE OF CAUSE: Paul Andrews v. The Attorney General of Canada
PLACE OF HEARING: Vancouver
DATE OF HEARING: June 4, 2003
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT : LINDEN, ROTHSTEIN, SEXTON, JJ.A.
DATED: June 4, 2003
APPEARANCES:
Mr. Paul Andrews APPLICANT on his own behalf
Mr. Michel Mathieu FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Mr. Paul Andrews APPLICANT on his own behalf
Mr. Morris Rosenberg FOR THE RESPONDENT
Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases