Ayangma v. Canada
Court headnote
Ayangma v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2004-09-20 Neutral citation 2004 FCA 305 File numbers A-467-02 Decision Content Date: 20040920 Docket: A-467-02 Citation: 2004 FCA 305 BETWEEN: Dr. Noel Ayangma Appellant -and- Her Majesty the Queen Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS FRANÇOIS PILON Assessment Officer [1] The appellant sought an order pursuant to Rule 399(2)(a) setting aside the order of this Court made on March 20, 2003 dismissing the appeal. The appellant's motion was dismissed with costs under Tariff B, Column 5 on October 1, 2003. [2] Ms. Jessica Harris, counsel for the respondent, filed her bill of costs on August 5, 2004 and requested that it be assessed in writing. Dr. Ayangma did not file written submissions in response to my letter sent to parties on August 10, 2004. [3] Counsel requests the minimum level of units for items 5, 6 and 26 of Column 5. These will therefore be allowed as presented. The disbursements for photocopying and postage are also allowed, being supported by affidavit evidence. [3] The bill of costs of the respondent is assessed and allowed in the amounts of $1,320.00 for fees and $145.80 for disbursements. A certificate of assessment will issue in the amount of $1,465.80. Halifax, Nova Scotia September 20, 2004 François Pilon Assessment Officer FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD COURT FILE NO.: A-467-02 STYLE OF CAUSE: Dr. Noel Ayangma Applicant -and- Her Majesty the Quee…
Read full judgment
Ayangma v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2004-09-20 Neutral citation 2004 FCA 305 File numbers A-467-02 Decision Content Date: 20040920 Docket: A-467-02 Citation: 2004 FCA 305 BETWEEN: Dr. Noel Ayangma Appellant -and- Her Majesty the Queen Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS FRANÇOIS PILON Assessment Officer [1] The appellant sought an order pursuant to Rule 399(2)(a) setting aside the order of this Court made on March 20, 2003 dismissing the appeal. The appellant's motion was dismissed with costs under Tariff B, Column 5 on October 1, 2003. [2] Ms. Jessica Harris, counsel for the respondent, filed her bill of costs on August 5, 2004 and requested that it be assessed in writing. Dr. Ayangma did not file written submissions in response to my letter sent to parties on August 10, 2004. [3] Counsel requests the minimum level of units for items 5, 6 and 26 of Column 5. These will therefore be allowed as presented. The disbursements for photocopying and postage are also allowed, being supported by affidavit evidence. [3] The bill of costs of the respondent is assessed and allowed in the amounts of $1,320.00 for fees and $145.80 for disbursements. A certificate of assessment will issue in the amount of $1,465.80. Halifax, Nova Scotia September 20, 2004 François Pilon Assessment Officer FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD COURT FILE NO.: A-467-02 STYLE OF CAUSE: Dr. Noel Ayangma Applicant -and- Her Majesty the Queen Respondent PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Halifax, NS ASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN WRITING WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF PARTIES PLACE OF ASSESMENT: Halifax, Nova Scotia ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS - BY: François Pilon, Assessment Officer DATED: September 20, 2004 SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Morris Rosenberg Deputy Attorney General Ottawa, Ontario for the Respondent
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca