Visx Inc. v. Nidek Co. Ltd.
Court headnote
Visx Inc. v. Nidek Co. Ltd. Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2001-06-14 Neutral citation 2001 FCA 201 File numbers A-616-00 Decision Content Date: 20010614 Docket: A-616-00 Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 201 CORAM: LINDEN J.A. ISAAC J.A. NOËL J.A. BETWEEN: VISX, INCORPORATED Appellant - and - NIDEK CO., LTD., DR. HOWARD GIMBEL and DR. DONALD JOHNSON Respondents Heard at Ottawa, Ontario on Thursday, June 14, 2001 Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa on June 14, 2001 REASONS FOR JUDGMENTOF THE COURT BY: NOËL J.A. Date: 20010614 Docket: A-616-00 Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 201 CORAM: LINDEN J.A. ISAAC J.A. NOËL J.A. BETWEEN: VISX, INCORPORATED Appellant - and - NIDEK CO., LTD., DR. HOWARD GIMBEL and DR. DONALD JOHNSON Respondents REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario on Thursday, June 14, 2001) NOËL J.A. [1] We are all of the view that the motions Judge committed no reviewable error in refusing to compel the respondents' affiants to answer specified questions at their cross-examinations. [2] The appeal will be dismissed with costs in favour of each respondent. "Marc Noël" J.A. …
Read full judgment
Visx Inc. v. Nidek Co. Ltd. Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2001-06-14 Neutral citation 2001 FCA 201 File numbers A-616-00 Decision Content Date: 20010614 Docket: A-616-00 Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 201 CORAM: LINDEN J.A. ISAAC J.A. NOËL J.A. BETWEEN: VISX, INCORPORATED Appellant - and - NIDEK CO., LTD., DR. HOWARD GIMBEL and DR. DONALD JOHNSON Respondents Heard at Ottawa, Ontario on Thursday, June 14, 2001 Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa on June 14, 2001 REASONS FOR JUDGMENTOF THE COURT BY: NOËL J.A. Date: 20010614 Docket: A-616-00 Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 201 CORAM: LINDEN J.A. ISAAC J.A. NOËL J.A. BETWEEN: VISX, INCORPORATED Appellant - and - NIDEK CO., LTD., DR. HOWARD GIMBEL and DR. DONALD JOHNSON Respondents REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario on Thursday, June 14, 2001) NOËL J.A. [1] We are all of the view that the motions Judge committed no reviewable error in refusing to compel the respondents' affiants to answer specified questions at their cross-examinations. [2] The appeal will be dismissed with costs in favour of each respondent. "Marc Noël" J.A.
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca