Thomas v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)
Source text
Thomas v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2012-04-19 Neutral citation 2012 FC 458 File numbers IMM-3385-12 Decision Content Date: 20120419 Docket: IMM-3385-12 Citation: 2012 FC 458 BETWEEN: LEONIE MARIA THOMAS Applicant and THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER PHELAN J. [1] These are the brief reasons for the Order granting the stay of deportation which was issued yesterday. [2] There is a significant factual point in issue on this motion which impacts the serious legal issue raised. The Applicant claims to have filed a spousal sponsorship H&C application in a timely manner. If accurate the Applicant would, arguably, be entitled to the benefit of a Ministerial policy which precludes her removal while the H&C application is being considered. [3] The resolution of this point may be somewhere in the mysteries of Canada Post who delivered the application to CIC Vegreville approximately three months after alleged mailing. The resolution may be elsewhere but time did not permit a proper exploration of the facts either through cross-examination or further affidavit evidence. [4] A deportation in these circumstances would, in reality, render the H&C application moot as the Applicant by virtue of the separation imposed by deportation would no longer qualify for the spousal sponsorship. [5] The balance of convenience favours the Applicant as it flows from the first two iss…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Thomas v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2012-04-19 Neutral citation 2012 FC 458 File numbers IMM-3385-12 Decision Content Date: 20120419 Docket: IMM-3385-12 Citation: 2012 FC 458 BETWEEN: LEONIE MARIA THOMAS Applicant and THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER PHELAN J. [1] These are the brief reasons for the Order granting the stay of deportation which was issued yesterday. [2] There is a significant factual point in issue on this motion which impacts the serious legal issue raised. The Applicant claims to have filed a spousal sponsorship H&C application in a timely manner. If accurate the Applicant would, arguably, be entitled to the benefit of a Ministerial policy which precludes her removal while the H&C application is being considered. [3] The resolution of this point may be somewhere in the mysteries of Canada Post who delivered the application to CIC Vegreville approximately three months after alleged mailing. The resolution may be elsewhere but time did not permit a proper exploration of the facts either through cross-examination or further affidavit evidence. [4] A deportation in these circumstances would, in reality, render the H&C application moot as the Applicant by virtue of the separation imposed by deportation would no longer qualify for the spousal sponsorship. [5] The balance of convenience favours the Applicant as it flows from the first two issues. [6] This case is somewhat similar to Terhemba Thomas Shase v The Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness 2011 FC 418 and I adopt Justice Lemieux’s approach to the issue of whether to grant a stay. [7] As I will also be deciding the Leave Application, the Applicant should know that this decision to grant a stay was “close to the line”. The granting of leave is not in any way certain. The Court will expect to see further and better evidence if the Applicant persists in the claim of a timely finding of her H&C. “Michael L. Phelan” Judge Toronto, Ontario April 19, 2012 FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-3385-12 STYLE OF CAUSE: LEONIE MARIA THOMAS v THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: April 18, 2012 REASONS FOR ORDER: PHELAN J. DATED: April 19, 2012 APPEARANCES: Kweku Ackaah-Boafo FOR THE APPLICANT Sybil Thompson FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Kweku Ackaah-Boafo Barrister & Solicitor Toronto, Ontario FOR THE APPLICANT Myles J. Kirvan Deputy Attorney General of Canada Toronto, Ontario FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca