Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2008

Lewis v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)

2008 FCA 245
EvidenceJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Lewis v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2008-08-15 Neutral citation 2008 FCA 245 File numbers A-369-08 Decision Content Date: 20080815 Docket: A-369-08 Citation: 2008 FCA 245 Present: NADON J.A. BETWEEN: VENEISHA YOLANDA LEWIS Appellant and THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Respondent Heard at Ottawa, Ontario (by teleconference) on August 15, 2008. Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on August 15, 2008. REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NADON J.A. Date: 20080815 Docket: A-369-08 Citation: 2008 FCA 245 Present: NADON J.A. BETWEEN: VENEISHA YOLANDA LEWIS Appellant and THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER NADON J.A. [1] This is a motion by the appellant for a stay of removal to Grenada, pending the determination of her appeal to this Court. [2] After hearing the parties’ oral submissions earlier today and after consideration of their written arguments, I conclude that the motion must be denied. [3] I have not been persuaded that the appellant’s removal to Grenada will cause irreparable harm to either her daughter or to herself. What the evidence before me shows is that the appellant’s removal will likely cause them hardship, but, in the circumstances, hardship does not amount to irreparable harm. [4] I am also of the view, for reasons similar to those expressed by Evans J.A. in Palka v. Canada, 2008 FCA 165, at paragraph 22, that the balance of…

Read full judgment
Lewis v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2008-08-15
Neutral citation
2008 FCA 245
File numbers
A-369-08
Decision Content
Date: 20080815
Docket: A-369-08
Citation: 2008 FCA 245
Present: NADON J.A.
BETWEEN:
VENEISHA YOLANDA LEWIS
Appellant
and
THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
Respondent
Heard at Ottawa, Ontario (by teleconference) on August 15, 2008.
Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on August 15, 2008.
REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NADON J.A.
Date: 20080815
Docket: A-369-08
Citation: 2008 FCA 245
Present: NADON J.A.
BETWEEN:
VENEISHA YOLANDA LEWIS
Appellant
and
THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
Respondent
REASONS FOR ORDER
NADON J.A.
[1] This is a motion by the appellant for a stay of removal to Grenada, pending the determination of her appeal to this Court.
[2] After hearing the parties’ oral submissions earlier today and after consideration of their written arguments, I conclude that the motion must be denied.
[3] I have not been persuaded that the appellant’s removal to Grenada will cause irreparable harm to either her daughter or to herself. What the evidence before me shows is that the appellant’s removal will likely cause them hardship, but, in the circumstances, hardship does not amount to irreparable harm.
[4] I am also of the view, for reasons similar to those expressed by Evans J.A. in Palka v. Canada, 2008 FCA 165, at paragraph 22, that the balance of convenience favours the Minister.
[5] Because of my conclusions on irreparable harm and the balance of convenience, I need not express my view with respect to the existence of a serious issue.
[6] For these reasons, the appellant’s motion for a stay of her removal to Grenada on August 17, 2008, will be denied.
“M. Nadon”
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-369-08
STYLE OF CAUSE: VENEISHA YOLANDA LEWIS v. MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa, Ontario (by teleconference)
DATE OF HEARING: August 15, 2008
REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NADON J.A.
DATED: August 15, 2008
APPEARANCES:
Ms. Chantal Desloges
FOR THE APPELLANT
Mr. Bradley Gotkin
Mr. David Cranton
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Green and Spiegel
Barristers and Solicitors
Toronto, Ontario
FOR THE APPELLANT
John H. Sims, Q.C.
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
FOR THE RESPONDENT

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases