Fehr v. Canada (Attorney General)
Court headnote
Fehr v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2005-09-15 Neutral citation 2005 FCA 299 File numbers A-565-04 Decision Content Date: 20050915 Docket: A-565-04 Citation: 2005 FCA 299 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. LINDENJ.A. SEXTON J.A. BETWEEN: JOHN FEHR Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia, on September 15, 2005. Judgment delivered from the Bench atVancouver, British Columbia, on September 15, 2005. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: LINDEN J.A. Date: 20050915 Docket: A-565-04 Citation: 2005 FCA 299 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. LINDENJ.A. SEXTON J.A. BETWEEN: JOHN FEHR Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia, on September 15, 2005.) LINDEN J.A. [1] In this case, the Pension Appeals Board held that the applicant, who lives in a remote British Columbia community, did not satisfy the severity test, that is, he did not demonstrate that he was "incapable regularly of pursuing any substantially gainful occupation" even though it was accepted that he had a "prolonged" injury. [2] The Board relied mainly on the evidence that he was capable of running a lawn-mowing business in the last few years, which had produced some substantial income during the 8 - 12 week summer season. [3] It also found that he was "capable" of maintaining the lawn-mowing contract for longer periods if it were available. [4] We have…
Read full judgment
Fehr v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2005-09-15 Neutral citation 2005 FCA 299 File numbers A-565-04 Decision Content Date: 20050915 Docket: A-565-04 Citation: 2005 FCA 299 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. LINDENJ.A. SEXTON J.A. BETWEEN: JOHN FEHR Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia, on September 15, 2005. Judgment delivered from the Bench atVancouver, British Columbia, on September 15, 2005. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: LINDEN J.A. Date: 20050915 Docket: A-565-04 Citation: 2005 FCA 299 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. LINDENJ.A. SEXTON J.A. BETWEEN: JOHN FEHR Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia, on September 15, 2005.) LINDEN J.A. [1] In this case, the Pension Appeals Board held that the applicant, who lives in a remote British Columbia community, did not satisfy the severity test, that is, he did not demonstrate that he was "incapable regularly of pursuing any substantially gainful occupation" even though it was accepted that he had a "prolonged" injury. [2] The Board relied mainly on the evidence that he was capable of running a lawn-mowing business in the last few years, which had produced some substantial income during the 8 - 12 week summer season. [3] It also found that he was "capable" of maintaining the lawn-mowing contract for longer periods if it were available. [4] We have not been persuaded that the Board made any error that would entitle this Court to interfere. [5] The application will be dismissed with costs fixed at $500. "A.M. Linden" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-565-04 (APPEAL FROM A DECISION OF THE PENSION APPEALS BOARD DATED SEPTEMBER 22, 2004, NO. 21712) STYLE OF CAUSE: John Fehr v. Attorney General of Canada PLACE OF HEARING: Vancouver, British Columbia DATE OF HEARING: September 15, 2005 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: Décary J.A. Linden J.A. Sexton J.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: Linden J.A. APPEARANCES: Craig Paterson FOR THE APPLICANT Michel Mathieu FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Paterson & Associates Barristers & Solicitors Vancouver, British Columbia FOR THE APPLICANT John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada Department of Justice Vancouver, British Columbia FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca