Hospitality Investments Ltd. v. Everett Lord Building Construction Ltd.

Hospitality Investments Ltd. v. Everett Lord Building Construction Ltd.
Collection
Supreme Court Judgments
Date
1996-11-08
Report
[1996] 3 SCR 605
Case number
24830
Judges
La Forest, Gérard V.; Sopinka, John; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Cory, Peter deCarteret; McLachlin, Beverley; Iacobucci, Frank; Major, John C.
On appeal from
New Brunswick
Subjects
Torts
Notes
SCC Case Information: 24830
Decision Content
Hospitality Investments Ltd. v. Everett Lord Building Construction Ltd., [1996] 3 S.C.R. 605
The Town of St. Andrews Appellant
v.
Hospitality Investments Ltd. Respondent
and
The Union of British Columbia Municipalities,
the Municipal Insurance Association of British Columbia
and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities Interveners
Indexed as: Hospitality Investments Ltd. v. Everett Lord Building Construction Ltd.
File No.: 24830.
1996: November 8.
Present: La Forest, Sopinka, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci and Major JJ.
on appeal from the court of appeal for new brunswick
Torts ‑‑ Negligence ‑‑ Duty of care ‑‑ Municipal liability ‑‑ Municipality not enforcing building by-law ‑‑ Building deficient ‑‑ No duty of care owed.
APPEAL from a judgment of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal (1995), 166 N.B.R. (2d) 241, 425 A.P.R. 241, 3 D.M.P.L. 175, allowing an appeal from a judgment of Jones J. (1993), 143 N.B.R. (2d) 258, 366 A.P.R. 258, 2 D.M.P.L. 385. Appeal allowed.
Barry R. Morrison, Q.C., and Timothy M. Hopkins, for the appellant.
Paulette C. Garnett, Q.C., and Rodney J. Gillis, Q.C., for the respondent.
John R. Singleton and Kate McLean, for the interveners.
The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by
1 La Forest J. -- Despite your valiant efforts, Ms. Garnett, we are all of the view that the appeal should be allowed.
2 We agree with the trial judge that no duty of care was owed to the respondent in the circumstances of this case. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed, the judgment of the Court of Appeal (1995), 166 N.B.R. (2d) 241, is reversed, and the trial judgment (1993), 143 N.B.R. (2d) 258, is restored, the whole with costs throughout.
Judgment accordingly.
Solicitors for the appellant: Clark, Drummie & Company, Saint John.
Solicitors for the respondent: Gilbert, McGloan, Gillis, Saint John.
Solicitors for the interveners: Singleton, Urquhart, Scott, Vancouver.