Landmark Family cases
Foundational UK family law authorities — divorce, children, matrimonial property — ordered by citation impact.
28 landmarks, ordered by citation impact.
- 01
Payne v Payne
[2001] EWCA Civ 166 · Court of Appeal · 2001Relocation applications require genuine motivation and realistic proposals benefiting child welfare.
- 02
Grant v Edwards
[1986] Ch 638 · Court of Appeal · 1986Household contributions can create constructive trust interest in family home
- 03
White v White
[2000] UKHL 54 · House of Lords · 2000House of Lords establishes equality principle in divorce financial settlements
- 04
Lambert v Lambert
[2002] EWCA Civ 1685 · Court of Appeal · 2002Contribution arguments rarely justify departure from equality principle in financial provision.
- 05
Charman v Charman (No 4)
[2007] EWCA Civ 503 · Court of Appeal · 2007Court of Appeal confirms sharing principle and limits of special contribution in big money divorce
- 06
Hyde v Hyde and Woodmansee
(1866) LR 1 P & D 130 · Court of Probate and Divorce · 1866Established classic definition of marriage as voluntary union between one man and woman.
- 07
Welfare Paramountcy — J v C
[1970] AC 668 · House of Lords · 1970Child's welfare is paramount; no presumption favoring natural parents over other carers.
- 08
Corbett v Corbett
[1971] P 83 · Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division · 1971Legal sex determined by chromosomal, gonadal and genital factors at birth.
- 09
Eves v Eves
[1975] 1 WLR 1338 · Court of Appeal · 1975Woman gains property interest through detrimental reliance despite no financial contribution
- 10
Gillick v West Norfolk
[1986] AC 112 · House of Lords · 1986House of Lords establishes children's right to consent to medical treatment
- 11
Re W
[1992] 4 All ER 627 · Court of Appeal · 1992Court can override competent minor's refusal of life-saving treatment
- 12
Re M and R (Child Abuse)
[1996] 2 FLR 195 · Court of Appeal · 1996Unproven allegations of child abuse cannot found care proceedings under threshold criteria.
- 13
Re H (Minors) (Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof)
[1996] AC 563 · House of Lords · 1996Civil standard applies in care proceedings but probability varies with allegation seriousness.
- 14
Re T (A Minor) (Wardship: Medical Treatment)
[1997] 1 WLR 242 · Court of Appeal · 1997Gillick-competent children cannot make binding refusals of life-saving medical treatment.
- 15
Piglowska v Piglowski
[1999] 1 WLR 1360 · House of Lords · 1999House of Lords clarifies when appeals courts can overturn family judges' discretionary decisions
- 16
Re A (Conjoined Twins)
[2001] Fam 147 · Court of Appeal · 2001Court authorizes separation of conjoined twins despite certain death of weaker twin
- 17
Bellinger v Bellinger
[2003] UKHL 21 · House of Lords · 2003Transsexual marriage rights incompatible with human rights law
- 18
Forced Marriage — Re SK (An Adult) (Forced Marriage: Appropriate Relief)
[2004] EWHC 3202 (Fam) · Family Division · 2004Courts have inherent jurisdiction to protect vulnerable adults from forced marriage.
- 19
Abduction — Re J (A Child) (Custody Rights: Jurisdiction)
[2005] UKHL 40 · House of Lords · 2005Wrongful removal under Hague Convention requires breach of actual custody rights.
- 20
Re G (Children)
[2006] UKHL 43 · House of Lords · 2006 - 21
Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane
[2006] UKHL 24 · House of Lords · 2006 - 22
Re L (Care: Threshold Criteria)
[2007] 1 FLR 2050 · Family Division · 2007Threshold criteria must be assessed at the time proceedings are commenced.
- 23
Re B (Children)
[2008] UKHL 35 · House of Lords · 2008 - 24
Radmacher v Granatino
[2010] UKSC 42 · Supreme Court · 2010Supreme Court gives prenuptial agreements decisive weight in divorce settlements
- 25
Wyatt v Vince
[2015] UKSC 14 · Supreme Court · 2015 - 26
Owens v Owens
[2018] UKSC 41 · Supreme Court · 2018 - 27
Domestic Violence — Re Y (Children)
[2019] EWCA Civ 2108 · Court of Appeal · 2019Domestic violence allegations require proper judicial fact-finding in children proceedings.
- 28
X and Y (Children: Adoption Order: Setting Aside), Re
[2026] UKSC 13 · United Kingdom Supreme Court · 2026Whether courts have jurisdiction to set aside a valid adoption order outside of appeal procedures.