What is the ratio in Re W?

The ratio is that while minors may be Gillick competent to consent to treatment, they do not have an absolute right to refuse life-saving medical treatment, which the court can override.

What did the court decide in Re W?

The Court of Appeal authorized medical treatment against a competent 16-year-old's wishes, establishing that the court can override refusal of life-saving treatment by minors.

Why is Re W important for children's rights?

It defines the limits of children's autonomy by establishing that Gillick competence does not grant absolute rights to refuse treatment, balancing autonomy with protection.

Premium Case

This case is available to Pro and Elite subscribers. Upgrade to access the full library of 500+ landmark cases.

Upgrade to Pro

← Back to Case Library

Premium Case

This case is available to Pro and Elite subscribers. Upgrade to access the full library of 500+ landmark cases.

Upgrade to Pro

← Back to Case Library