Aiello v. R.
Court headnote
Aiello v. R. Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1979-05-29 Report [1979] 2 SCR 15 Judges Martland, Ronald; Ritchie, Roland Almon; Pigeon, Louis-Philippe; Beetz, Jean; Estey, Willard Zebedee; Pratte, Yves; McIntyre, William Rogers On appeal from Ontario Subjects Criminal law Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Aiello v. R., [1979] 2 S.C.R. 15 Date: 1979-05-29 Lawrence Eugene Aiello (Plaintiff) Appellant; and Her Majesty The Queen (Defendant) Respondent. 1979: May 29. Present: Martland, Ritchie, Pigeon, Beetz, Estey, Pratte and McIntyre JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO. Criminal law—Drugs—Possession for the purpose of trafficking. APPEAL from a judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario[1] allowing an appeal by the Crown against an acquittal on a charge of possession of a narcotic for the purpose of trafficking. Appeal dismissed. Allan D. Gold, for the appellant. E.G. Ewaschuk and M.R. Dambrot, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by MARTLAND J.—We all agree with the reasons of Martin J.A., who delivered the judgment of the Court of Appeal. The appeal is dismissed. Appeal dismissed. Solicitors for the appellant: Greenspan, Gold & Moldaver, Toronto. Solicitor for the respondent: R. Tassé, Ottawa [1] (1978), 38 C.C.C. 485. …
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.scc-csc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Aiello v. R. Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1979-05-29 Report [1979] 2 SCR 15 Judges Martland, Ronald; Ritchie, Roland Almon; Pigeon, Louis-Philippe; Beetz, Jean; Estey, Willard Zebedee; Pratte, Yves; McIntyre, William Rogers On appeal from Ontario Subjects Criminal law Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Aiello v. R., [1979] 2 S.C.R. 15 Date: 1979-05-29 Lawrence Eugene Aiello (Plaintiff) Appellant; and Her Majesty The Queen (Defendant) Respondent. 1979: May 29. Present: Martland, Ritchie, Pigeon, Beetz, Estey, Pratte and McIntyre JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO. Criminal law—Drugs—Possession for the purpose of trafficking. APPEAL from a judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario[1] allowing an appeal by the Crown against an acquittal on a charge of possession of a narcotic for the purpose of trafficking. Appeal dismissed. Allan D. Gold, for the appellant. E.G. Ewaschuk and M.R. Dambrot, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by MARTLAND J.—We all agree with the reasons of Martin J.A., who delivered the judgment of the Court of Appeal. The appeal is dismissed. Appeal dismissed. Solicitors for the appellant: Greenspan, Gold & Moldaver, Toronto. Solicitor for the respondent: R. Tassé, Ottawa [1] (1978), 38 C.C.C. 485.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca
R v Brown
[2022] 1 SCR 506